Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27654 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:46914-DB
CCC No. 470 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
CCC NO. 470 OF 2024 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. PUTTAMMA
WIFE OF LATE DASAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
R/AT BILLENAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST,
SANTHEBACHAHALLI HOBLI
K.R. PETE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 436.
Digitally ...COMPLAINANT
signed by
PRABHAKAR (BY SRI S. PRASHANTH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)
SWETHA
KRISHNAN AND:
Location:
High Court 1. SRI. NANDISH
of Karnataka FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
COMPLAINANT, MAJOR,
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:46914-DB
CCC No. 470 of 2024
2. SRI NISARGA PRIYA
FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
COMPLAINANT MAJOR
THE TAHASILDAR, K.R. PETE TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 426.
...ACCUSED
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY
TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT
M.S.BUILDING
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU-560 001
...PRO FORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. PRATHIMA HONNAPURA, AAG A/W
SRI K.S. HARISH, GA FOR ACCUSED No. 3)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO TAKE
COGNIZANCE OF THE COMMISSION OR OFFENCE OF CONTEMPT
OF COURT VIOLATING THE ORDER/DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THIS
HON'BLE COURT DATED 07.09.2023 PASSED IN W.P.NOS.5675/2023
(KLR-RES), VIDE ANNEXURE - A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
N. V. ANJARIA
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:46914-DB
CCC No. 470 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. S. Prashanth Chandra for the
complainant could not dispute the factum of the endorsement. He
further submitted that in view of the endorsement, the contempt
petition may not survive. However, he requested the Court to
reserve liberty for the complainant to challenge the endorsement.
2. In view of the endorsement, the directions of learned Single
Judge to decide the representation is complied with. Therefore, the
contempt would not survive. It is accordingly disposed of.
At the same time, liberty is reserved for the complainant to
institute independent proceedings, if he is not satisfied with the
endorsement. However, this Court does not express any opinion on
merits in that regard.
Sd/-
(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!