Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27642 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16861
RSA No. 5683 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
RSA NO. 5683 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. BASAVVA W/O. SHIDDAPPA JADI,
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
2. DEVAPPA S/O. SHIDDAPPA JADI,
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT: GADAG,
NOW AT KADADI VILLAGE,
TQ AND DIST.: GADAG-582101.
... APPELLANTS
VISHAL
Digitally
signed by
VISHAL
NINGAPPA
(A1- BASAVVA (DECEASED) ABATED;
A2-DEVAPPA-SERVICE IS HELD SUFFICIENT(ABSENT))
NINGAPPA PATTIHAL
PATTIHAL Date:
2024.11.21
10:49:29
+0530
AND:
1. DEVAKKA CALLING HERSELF AS
W/O. SHIDDAPPA JADI @ HOSAMANI,
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE,
R/O. JANATHA COLONY,
NEAR HOUSE OF SOMAPPA KALAI, MASJID,
HOMBAL NAKA, GADAG-582101.
2. KAMALAVVA W/O. FAKKIRAPPA BELLAD,
AGE: MAJOR, R/O. DONI,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16861
RSA No. 5683 of 2012
TQ. MUNDARGI,
DIST. GADAG-582101.
3. HULIGEMMA W/O. SURESH MUTAGAR,
AGE: MAJOR, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. JANATA
COLONY, GADAG, DIST. GADAG-582101.
4. NEELAVVA D/O. SIDDAPPA JADI,
AGE: MINOR,
5. SANGAVVA D/O. SIDDAPPA JADI,
AGE: MINOR,
4 AND 5 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED
BY THEIR MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1
BEING NATURAL GUARDIAN.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.S.YADRAMI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2 AND R3-SERVICE IS HELD SUFFICIENT;
R4 AND R5 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY R1)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD:30.03.2012 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.44/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING
OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT AT GADAG, ALLOWING THE
APPEAL, FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DTD:06.04.2010
AND THE DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.53/2005 ON THE
FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) & CJM, GADAG,
DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND
INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16861
RSA No. 5683 of 2012
ORAL ORDER
Registry to delete the name of learned counsel
Sri.Shivaraj S. Balloli from the cause list.
Court notice issued to the appellants has been
returned with an endorsement as appellant No.1 is
deceased. Appeal stands abated as against appellant No.1.
Appellant No.2 is served and called out twice.
Notice to appellant No.2 is held sufficient.
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant
No.2.
It appears that the appellant No.2 is not interested in
prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA)
PJ, CT:PA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!