Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27379 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:46229
HRRP No. 32 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
HRRP NO. 32 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SMT YASHODHA
W/O. LATE. MONAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/AT LAXMI NILAYA COMPOUND
SRI. DEVI COLLEGE ROAD
KODIALBAIL, MANGALORE-575 005 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJASHEKAR S ., ADV.)
AND:
RAJESHCHAND
S/O. LATE. NAVEENCHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R./AT GURUDFOS PUMPS
KURIAS ROAD, NEAR
Digitally signed NATIONAL GUARD
by RAMYA D
Location: HIGH
HEAD QUARTERS
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
AI BADAGA STREET
RIYADH, SAUDHI ARABIA - 307 501 ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAKESH KINI., ADV.)
THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.08.2019 PASSED IN REVISION
RENT PETITION NO.13/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K. MANGALURU,
DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 01.06.2018 PASSED IN H.R.C NO.19/2014
ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:46229
HRRP No. 32 of 2019
MANGALORE, D.K., ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER
SEC.27(2)(a) AND (r) OF KARNATAKA RENT ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the respondent filed a memo
stating that Ex.Case No.292/2019 filed for execution of the
decree in HRC was executed and delivery warrant was
issued and accordingly, the respondent/owner has taken
possession of the petition schedule premises. Therefore,
the decree was fully satisfied.
2. This is not denied by the petitioner herein. It is the
case of the petitioner herein that the present petitioner is
a tenant and the owner of the petition schedule premises
had executed a Will in favour of the petitioner. Thus
became the owner. It is submitted by the counsel for the
respondent herein that the Will is not produced before the
trial Court. Admittedly, the review petitioner is a tenant.
NC: 2024:KHC:46229
3. Now, in the execution, decree is fully satisfied and
delivery warrant has been issued and the respondent
herein has taken possession of the petition schedule
premises. Therefore, the revision petition has become
infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
4. In view of dismissal of the petition, all pending
applications do not survive for consideration. Hence, the
same are also disposed of.
SD/-
(HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
HA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!