Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Manager United India Insurance Co. ... vs Sri D T Manjunatha
2024 Latest Caselaw 27347 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27347 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Manager United India Insurance Co. ... vs Sri D T Manjunatha on 14 November, 2024

                                            -1-
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC:46269
                                                    MFA No. 7833 of 2022




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                          BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
                 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7833 OF 2022(MV-I)
                 BETWEEN:

                 THE MANAGER,
                 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD
                 BRANCH OFFICE, P. B. NO.114,
                 REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
                 CRESCENT COURT, K. M. ROAD,
                 CHIKKAMAGALUR, PINCODE-577101.
                                                            ...APPELLANT
                 (BY SRI. RAVISH BENNI, ADVOCATE)

                 AND:
                 1.    SRI. D. T. MANJUNATHA,
                       S/O THAMMAIAH,
                       AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                       COOLIE WORK,
                       R/O DODDINATHALE,
Digitally signed
by AASEEFA             KUSUBURU VILLAGE,
PARVEEN                N R PURA AND TALUK,
Location: HIGH         CHIKMAGALUR DIST-577 134.
COURT OF         2.    SRI. KRISHNA POOJARI,
KARNATAKA
                       S/O ITHA POOJARI,
                       AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
                       COOLIE WORK,
                       R/O. SHANKARAPURA,
                       MUTTHINAKOPPA VILLAGE,
                       N R PURA AND TALUK,
                       CHIKMAGALUR DIST-577 134.
                                                         ...RESPONDENTS
                 (BY SRI. RAJENDRA K. R., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
                 R2- NOTICE DISPENSED WITH, V/O. DATED 22.11.2022)
                                 -2-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:46269
                                            MFA No. 7833 of 2022




     THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.07.2022 PASSED IN
MVC NO.21/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, N R PURA, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF
RS.5,06,660/- WITH INTEREST AT 9 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE
DATE OF PETITION TILL REALIZATION OF COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DICTATING JUDGMENT,
THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:       HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA


                        ORAL JUDGMENT

Heard Sri.Raveesh Benni, learned counsel for appellant as

well Ms.Sushmitha K., learned counsel who represents

Sri.Rajendra K.R., learned counsel for respondent No.1.

2. Challenge in this appeal is the order that is

rendered by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, N.R. Pura, in

MVC No.21/2021 dated 18.07.2022. The Tribunal through the

impugned order awarded a sum of Rs.5,06,660/- as

compensation divided under the following heads:

Sl. Heads of compensation Amount in No Rs.

        1    Pain and agony                        40,000-00
        2    Medical expenses                      19,500-00
        3    Food             attendant,
             conveyance,    nourishment
                                                    9,000-00
             and     other     incidental
             charges etc.,

                                            NC: 2024:KHC:46269





      4    Loss of income during laid         33,000-00
           up period
      5    Loss of future income            3,80,160-00
      6    Loss of amenities of life          25,000-00
                   Total                   5,06,660-00


3. The only grievance of the appellant as projected by

its counsel Sri.Raveesh Benni is that the disability as assessed

by CW1 is 23% in respect of right lower limb and therefore

1/3rd of the same has to be taken towards the whole body

disability, but the Tribunal took the permanent disability in

respect of whole body as 18% which is improper. Learned

counsel seeks the Court to pass necessary orders.

4. Ms.Sushmitha representing respondent No.1 on the

other hand contends that respondent No.1/claimant sustained

head injury and therefore the disability assessed by the

Tribunal is proper.

5. CW1 assessed the disability as 23% in respect of

right lower limb. No assessment whatsoever is made regarding

the disability of respondent No.1/claimant due to head injury.

Therefore, the submission made by learned counsel for

respondent No.1 in this regard cannot be considered.

NC: 2024:KHC:46269

6. Having regard to the fact that the disability in

respect of particular limb as deposed by CW1 is 23%, this Court

is of the view that there is justification in the point projected by

the appellant that the disability in respect of whole body is

required to be taken as 8%. Thus, taking the disability in

respect of whole body as 8% and without disturbing the other

parameters, the compensation which the respondent

No.1/claimant is entitled to under the head loss of future

earnings due to permanent physical disability in respect of

whole body is Rs.1,68,960/- (Rs.11,000/- x 12 x 16 x 8%).

7. The Tribunal through the impugned order awarded

a sum of Rs.3,80,160/- towards loss of future income. Thus,

the income awarded in excess is Rs.2,11,200/-. Therefore, the

compensation which the respondent No.1/claimant is entitled to

is Rs.2,95,460/- in total (Rs.5,06,660/- - Rs.2,11,200/-).

8. Thus, the appeal is disposed of with the following

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part.

NC: 2024:KHC:46269

ii) The compensation that is granted by the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, N.R. Pura through orders in MVC

No.21/2021 dated 18.07.2022 is decreased from Rs.5,06,660/-

to Rs.2,95,460/-.

iii) The amount, if any, in deposit be transmitted to the

concerned Tribunal immediately.

Interlocutory Applications, if any is pending, stands

closed.

Sd/-

(DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE

AP CT:TSM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter