Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr Ramesh vs Sri Hanumanthaiah
2024 Latest Caselaw 27066 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27066 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Mr Ramesh vs Sri Hanumanthaiah on 12 November, 2024

Author: N S Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N S Sanjay Gowda

                                              -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:45988
                                                       MFA No. 2011 of 2020




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                            BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2011 OF 2020(MV-I)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    MR. RAMESH
                         S/O. SRINIVAS
                         AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
                         R/OF NO.841, KHB COLONY
                         KENGERI UPANAGARA
                         KENGERI, BENGALURU-560 060.
                                                                 ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI B. CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    SRI HANUMANTHAIAH
                         S/O. LATE THIBBAIAH
                         MAJOR
                         (AGE NOT KNOW TO APPELLANT)
Digitally signed         R/OF BILIDEALAYA VILLAGE
by KIRAN                 KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK
KUMAR R
                         TUMKUR DISTRICT.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA          2.    THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
                         D.O.6TH FLOOR, KRUSHI BHAVAN
                         NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
                         HUDSON CIRCLE
                         BENGALURU-560 001.
                                                               ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SMT. MANJULA N. TEJASWI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2;
                       VIDE ORDER DATED 11.04.2022, NOTICE TO R-1
                       IS DISPENSED WITH)
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC:45988
                                     MFA No. 2011 of 2020




     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.06.2019
PASSED IN MVC NO. 6842/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER,
MACT, XVIII, ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES,
MACT, BENGALURU, (SCCH-4),       PARTLY ALLOWING THE
CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

    THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA


                    ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Being dissatisfied with the award of compensation of

Rs.6,66,000/-, the claimant is in appeal seeking

enhancement.

2. The occurrence of the accident and the liability to

pay compensation by the Insurer are not in dispute.

3. The evidence on record indicates that the claimant

had suffered a fracture of metacarpal head right 2nd,

supra condylar fracture of right femur, fracture of

right tibial condyle and fracture of patella. The

doctor who was examined though not the treated

doctor, has stated that the claimant had suffered

NC: 2024:KHC:45988

50% disability to right lower limb and 25% to the

whole body. In light of the medical evidence that the

claimant had suffered three major fractures to the

lower limb, it would be appropriate to treat the whole

body disability at 20%.

4. The Tribunal has taken the notional income of the

claimant as Rs.10,000/-, since there was no evidence

to that effect. As the Karnataka State Legal Services

Authority has determined the notional income as

Rs.11,000/- for the accident of the year 2017, it

would be appropriate to determine the notional

income of the claimant at Rs.11,000/-.

5. Since the claimant was aged 37 years and the

disability suffered is 20%, 40% is to be added

towards future prospects to determine monthly

income of the claimant for awarding compensation

towards 'loss of future income' which comes to

Rs.15,400/-.

NC: 2024:KHC:45988

6. Consequently, the claimant would be entitled to a

sum of Rs.5,54,500/- (Rs.15,400/- X 12 X '15' X

20%) towards 'loss of future earnings'.

7. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.50,000/- towards 'pain

and sufferings', Rs.50,000/- towards 'food,

conveyance, nourishment and attendant charges'

and Rs.40,000/- towards 'loss of amenities'. In my

view, the same are just and proper and are,

therefore, affirmed.

8. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of 1,60,000/-

towards 'medical expenses', and Rs.20,000/- towards

'future medical expenses' based on documentary

evidence. The same are just and proper, and are

accordingly affirmed.

9. The Tribunal has taken the laid-up period as four

months. Since the monthly income is now taken as

Rs.11,000/- and the claimant had suffered three

fractures, the laid-up period is treated as six months

NC: 2024:KHC:45988

and hence, the claimant is entitled to Rs.66,000/-

towards 'loss of income during laid-up period'.

10. Consequently, the award of the Tribunal is modified

and the following sums are awarded as

compensation:

As awarded As awarded Sl. by the by this Compensation under Tribunal Court No. different Heads (Rs.) (Rs.)

1. Pain and sufferings 50,000/- 50,000/-

Loss of future 3,06,000/- 5,54,500/-

2.

earnings

3. Medical expenses 1,60,000/- 1,60,000/-

Loss of income 40,000/- 66,000/-

4. during the laid up period

Conveyance, 50,000/- 50,000/-

5. nourishment and nutritious food

Loss of amenities in 40,000/- 40,000/-

6. life

7. Future medical 20,000/- 20,000/-

         expenses

                   Total           6,66,000/- 9,40,500/-

                                                  NC: 2024:KHC:45988





11.     Accordingly,     the    claimant   is     held   entitled   for

        compensation       of     Rs.9,40,500/-          as   against

Rs.6,66,000/- along with interest at the rate of 6%

p.a. from the date of petition till its realisation.

12. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

amount of compensation awarded within two months

from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this

judgment.

13. The other aspects of the Award of the Tribunal

remain undisturbed.

14. This appeal is, accordingly, allowed in part.

Sd/-

(N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

HNM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter