Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26797 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:45363
CRL.RP No. 912 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 912 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SANTHOSH,
PROPRIETOR,
M/S. SAI VANDANA WIRE INDUSTRIES,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT NO.2/268, KALAIGNAR NAGAR,
MADUKKARAJ ROAD, PODIPALYAM,
SEERAPALAYAM POST, COIMBATORE - 641 105.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR D, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. DEVENDRA E.N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. ADITYA BUSINESS CORPORATION,
Digitally
signed by REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
MALATESH MR. P. SHABARISH,
KC
Location: NO.74/1, 1ST FLOOR, 5TH MAIN,
HIGH 6TH CROSS, VALLABHA NAGAR,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA UTTARAHALLI, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST,
BANGALORE - 560 061.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. B.R. VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 03.10.2023
PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:45363
CRL.RP No. 912 of 2024
SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY IN CRL.A.NO.904/2022
AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.12.2021 PASSED BY
THE LEARNED XXXVIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU IN CC.NO.10956/2021 FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NI ACT AND CONSEQUENTLY, ACQUIT
THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
1. A sum of Rs.1,00,000/- is paid by the revision
petitioner to the respondent through bank transfer. Same
is confirmed by Sri. B.R. Vishwanath representing the
respondent . For the balance amount, revision petitioner
seeks time.
2. A memo is filed by the learned counsel for
revision petitioner Sri. B.R. Vishwanath appearing for the
respondent has no objection to grant the installments for
the balance amount.
NC: 2024:KHC:45363
4. The memo reads as under:
"The above named revision petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) to the Respondent by way of NEFT and the same was recorded by this Hon'ble Court and was also acknowledged by respondent Advocate. The petitioner is producing this memo for production of payment status made by revision petitioner for reference purpose. Hence, his memo."
5. Placing the memo on record, revision petition
sands disposed of. If the amount is not paid as per he
memo, order of the Trial Magistrate stands restored
automatically.
If the amount as ordered is not paid as per the
memo, the revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment
for a period of one year.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SNC
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!