Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26472 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:44756-DB
CCC No. 995 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 995 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. K. DEEPAK,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
S/O. MR. KRISHNA
WORKING AS COURT OFFICER,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
PRINCIPAL BENCH,
BENGALURU - 560 001
...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. SAMEER SHARMA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally
signed by
PRABHAKAR 1. SMT. MANASA KRISHNAPPA
SWETHA DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
KRISHNAN
Location: HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 146,
High Court of 8TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
Karnataka MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU - 560 003
2. SRI. K.S. NAVEEN
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE
SOCIETIES (HOUSING AND ORS.)
HAVING OFFICE AT ALI ASKER ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:44756-DB
CCC No. 995 of 2024
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATION
MS BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
...ACCUSED
(BY SRI. K.S. HARISH, GOVT. ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 AND RULE 3 OF THE HIGH
COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS)
RULES, 1981, PRAYING TO FIND THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2
GUILTY OF COMMISSION OF CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER DATED
01.07.2024 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP
NO.16270/2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO
CONVICT THE ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 FOR THE SAME AND
CONSEQUENTLY ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 TO IMPRISONMENT
FOR A TERM OF SIX (6) MONTHS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
N. V. ANJARIA
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:44756-DB
CCC No. 995 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Shri Sameer Sharma for the
petitioner fairly submitted that in view of the compliance
affidavit, the present contempt petition does not require to
be prosecuted further.
2. In view of the submission, nothing further survives in
the present contempt petition.
3. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of as
not surviving.
Sd/-
(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
YN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!