Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kairunnissa Hatelasab @ Hatelappa ... vs Irawwa Hatelalppa Talawar
2024 Latest Caselaw 26387 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26387 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Kairunnissa Hatelasab @ Hatelappa ... vs Irawwa Hatelalppa Talawar on 6 November, 2024

                                                 -1-
                                                             NC: 2024:KHC-D:16210
                                                           RSA No. 100838 of 2018




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                          DHARWAD BENCH

                             DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                               BEFORE

                               THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA

                                  RSA NO. 100838 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ)

                        BETWEEN:

                        1.   KAIRUNNISSA HATELASAB
                             @ HATELAPPA TALAWAR,
                             AGE: 58 YEARS,
                             OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
                             R/O: MUGAD,
                             TQ/DIST: DHARWAD-580007.

                        2.   MAKBULSAB HATELASAB
                             @ HATELAPPA TALAWAR,
                             AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
           Digitally
                             R/O: MUGAD,
           signed by

VISHAL
NINGAPPA
           VISHAL
           NINGAPPA
           PATTIHAL
                             TQ/DIST: DHARWAD-580007.
PATTIHAL   Date:
           2024.11.08
           10:54:14
           +0530
                                                                    ...APPELLANTS
                        (BY SRI. VINAY S. KOUJALAGI, ADVOCATE)

                        AND:

                        1.   IRAWWA HATELALPPA TALAWAR
                             AGE: 58 YEARS,
                             OCC: COOLIE,
                             R/O: ALNAVAR,
                             TQ AND DIST: DHARWAD-581103.
                           -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:16210
                                      RSA No. 100838 of 2018




2.   NAGESH HATELAPPA TALAWAR
     AGE: 38 YEARS,
     OCC: COOLIE,
     R/O: ALNAVAR,
     TQ AND DIST: DHARWAD-581103.

3.   THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
     ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION,
     ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT,
     HUBBALLI-DHARWAD ROAD,
     DHARWAD-580006.
                                               ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ P. MUDHOL, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
R1 AND R2 ARE NOTICE SERVED)

     THIS RSA IS FILED U/SEC.100 READ WITH ORDER 42
RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE
DATED 22.04.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO.156/2014 ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF
JUDICIAL   MAGISTRATE,    DHARWAD,         DISMISSING    THE
APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 04.09.2014, PASSED IN O.S. NO.331/2005 ON THE
FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR
DIVISION) AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS,
DHARWAD,     DISMISSING         THE     SUIT     FILED   FOR
DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION.


     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
                               -3-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC-D:16210
                                    RSA No. 100838 of 2018




                  ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA)

(PER: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA)

1. Against the concurrent findings of facts recorded

by the Courts below, the plaintiffs are before this Court in

this Regular Second Appeal.

2. Suit for the relief of declaration and injunction

declaring that plaintiff No.1 is the wife of the deceased

Hatelappa @ Hatelsab and plaintiff No.2 is the son of

plaintiff No.1 and the deceased Hatelappa @ Hatelsab and

that they are entitled for service benefits of the deceased

Hatelappa @ Hatelsab.

3. It is the case of the plaintiff that the deceased

Hatelappa @ Hatelsab converted himself to Muslim Religion

and has married the first plaintiff as per their community

and from the wedlock plaintiff No.2 is born and they are

entitled for the death benefits of deceased Hatelappa @

Hatelsab.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:16210

4. Defendant Nos.1 and 2 contested the suit of the

plaintiffs, denied the plaint averments and inter alia

specifically contended that defendant Nos.1 and 2 are wife

and son of deceased Hatelappa @ Hatelsab and denied any

relation of the plaintiffs with that of Hatelappa @ Hatelsab.

5. In order to substantiate their claim, the plaintiff

examined herself as PW1 and marked documents at Exs.P1

to P12 and also examined one witness as PW2. Defendant

No.1 examined himself as DW1 and marked documents at

Exs.D1 to D5 and also examined one witness as DW2.

6. The trial court based on the pleadings, oral and

documentary evidence arrived at a conclusion that

(i) The plaintiffs have failed to prove that the plaintiff No.1 is the legally wedded wife of the deceased Hatelappa @ Hatelsab &

(ii) From the wedlock of plaintiff No.1 with deceased Hatelappa @ Hatelsab plaintiff No.2 is born.

By the judgment and decree, the trial Court dismissed the

suit of the plaintiffs. Aggrieved, the plaintiffs preferred

NC: 2024:KHC-D:16210

appeal before the First Appellate Court. The First Appellate

Court while re-appreciating and reconsidering the entire

oral and documentary evidence, independently, affirmed

the judgment and decree of the trial Court.

7. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

appellants and the learned counsel appearing for

respondent No.3. Though respondent Nos.1 and 2 have

been served with the notice, they have chosen to remain

absent.

8. Suit of the plaintiffs is for declaration and

injunction. The burden is heavily on the plaintiffs to prove

that plaintiff No.1 is wife of Hatelappa @ Hatelsab who later

converted himself to Islam Religion and he was called as

Hatelsab. PW1 produced Exs. P7 and P8 to contend that the

plaintiff No.1 was married to Hatelappa. Ex.P6 shows the

name of Hatelsab. Exs.P8, P9 & P10 are the Daftar Nikah,

wherein the name is shown as Hatelsab. The plaintiff

contends that the Hatelappa had converted to Islam

Religion and was called as Hatelsab. There is no material

NC: 2024:KHC-D:16210

forthcoming to indicate that Hatelappa is also known as

Hatelsab and there is conversion of Hatelappa to another

community, other than the mere averments in the plaint,

there is no clinching evidence to substantiate their claim.

Neither there is any evidence to indicate that plaintiff No.2

is born to plaintiff No.1 and deceased Hatelappa. On the

other hand, the material on record indicates that plaintiff

No.1 was married to one Chandsab, which is not disputed

by the plaintiffs. The trial Court arrived at a conclusion that

the plaintiff has failed to establish her relationship with that

of Hatelappa. The First Appellate Court being the last fact

finding Court reassessed and reconsidered the entire oral

and documentary evidence and arrived at a conclusion that

the plaintiff has failed to establish that she is the wife of

Hatelappa who is also known as Hatelsab and from their

marriage plaintiff No.2 is born. The manner in which the

Courts below have assessed the entire oral and

documentary evidence, this Court is of the considered view

that no substantial question of law arises for consideration

NC: 2024:KHC-D:16210

in the present Regular Second Appeal to be dealt with under

Section 100 CPC and this Court pass the following:

:ORDER:

       (i)    The        Regular     Second     Appeal    stands

               dismissed.


(ii) The judgment and decree of the Courts

below stands confirmed.

Sd/-

_____________________ (JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA) VNP / CT: VP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter