Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Sathish Achar vs Sri Suryakanth
2024 Latest Caselaw 26245 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26245 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri Sathish Achar vs Sri Suryakanth on 5 November, 2024

Author: N S Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N S Sanjay Gowda

                                                -1-
                                                             NC: 2024:KHC:45986
                                                           MFA No. 8641 of 2018




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                              BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8641 OF 2018(MV-I)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    SRI SATHISH ACHAR
                         S/O. PARAMESHWAR ACHARYA
                         AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
                         R/O. VINYAKA NAGAR
                         KUMBHASHI, KUNDAPURA TALUK
                         UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 201.
                                                                   ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI S. M. ANJAL, FOR;
                       SRI K. PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATES)

                   AND:

                   1.    SRI SURYAKANTH
                         S/O. SHIVALINGAPPA
                         AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
Digitally signed         DRIVER
by KIRAN
KUMAR R                  GULBARGA K. S. R. T. C. DEPOT.
Location: HIGH           GULBARGA - 530 112
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   2.    MANAGING DIRECTOR
                         K. S. R. T. C., GULBARGA DEPOT.
                         GULBARGA - 530 112.
                                                                ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI B. L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R-2;
                       VIDE ORDER DATED 15.10.2024, NOTICE TO R-1 IS
                       DISPENSED WITH)
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:45986
                                      MFA No. 8641 of 2018




     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.08.2016
PASSED IN MVC NO.1015/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE       ADDITION
MACT, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
OF COMPENSATION.

    THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIWN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA


                    ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Being dissatisfied with the award of compensation of

Rs.1,88,000/-, the claimant is in this appeal seeking

enhancement.

2. The occurrence of the accident and the KSRTC'S

liability to pay compensation are not in dispute.

3. The Tribunal has recorded a finding that the claimant

had suffered an injury to his left waist and crush

injury to the right hand finger and had also suffered

a fracture to the femur of his right leg, apart from an

injury to his right ankle and further fracture to the

big toe of his right foot. The doctor who was

examined has stated that the claimant has suffered a

NC: 2024:KHC:45986

disability to the extent of 20% to the lower limb and

6% to the upper limb. In my view, it would be

appropriate to treat the whole body disability at 15%

as he has suffered two fractures.

4. Since there was no evidence of the income of the

claimant, as the Karnataka State Legal Services

Authority has determined the notional income as

Rs.7,000/- for the accident of the year 2012, it would

be appropriate to determine the notional income of

the claimant at Rs.7.000/-. Since the claimant was

aged 36 years, the appropriate multiplier would be

'15'. Consequently, the claimant would be entitled to

a sum of Rs.1,89,000/- (Rs.7,000/- X 12 X '15' X

15%) towards 'loss of future earnings'.

5. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.40,000/-

towards 'pain and suffering' and has not awarded any

amount towards 'loss of amenities'. In my view,

having regard to the nature of injuries suffered by

NC: 2024:KHC:45986

the claimant, it would be appropriate to award

Rs.50,000/- each under the said heads.

6. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.15,000/-

towards 'food, nutrition, conveyance and attendant

charges'. Since the claimant was hospitalised for 18

days, it would be appropriate to award Rs.25,000/-

under the said head.

7. The Tribunal has taken the laid-up period as three

months. This laid-up period assessed by the Tribunal

is just and proper, and since the income is assessed

at Rs.7,000/-, the claimant would be entitled to a

sum of Rs.21,000/- (Rs.7,000/- X 3 months)

towards 'loss of earnings during laid up period'.

8. As regards Rs.73,000/- awarded towards medical

expenses which is awarded based on documentary

evidence is just and proper, and the same is

accordingly affirmed.

NC: 2024:KHC:45986

9. Consequently, the award of the Tribunal is modified

and the following sums are awarded as

compensation:

                           As                           As
                           awarded                      awarded
     Sl. Compensation      by     the                   by    this
     No. under   different Tribunal                     Court
         Heads
                           (Rs.)                        (Rs.)

     1.     Pain and sufferings             40,000/-       50,000/-

            Loss     of       future        40,000/-     1,89,000/-
     2.
            earnings

     3.     Medical expenses                73,000/-       73,000/-

            Loss   of   income              20,000/-       21,000/-
     4.     during the laid up
            period

            Conveyance,                     15,000/-       25,000/-
     5.     nourishment            and
            nutritious food

            Loss of amenities in                  Nil      50,000/-
     6.
            life

            Total                        1,88,000/- 4,08,000/-




10. Accordingly, the claimant is held entitled to a

compensation of Rs.4,08,000/- as against

Rs.1,88,000/- along with interest at the rate of 6%

NC: 2024:KHC:45986

p.a. on the enhanced amount from the date of

petition till its realisation.

11. However, the claimant would not be entitled to

interest for the delayed period as per order dated

22.10.2024.

12. The KSRTC is directed to deposit the amount of

compensation awarded within two months from the

date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

13. The other aspects of the Award of the Tribunal

remain undisturbed.

14. This appeal is, accordingly, allowed in part.

Sd/-

(N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

HNM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter