Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12093 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:18681
RFA No. 575 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 575 OF 2018 (PAR/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. T. G. CHANDRASHEKAR,
S/O. N. GANGADARAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT NO.2011/2321,
MALLATHAHALLI VILLAGE,
YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. YOGESH M. DESAI.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. T. G. RAJASHEKAR,
S/O. N. GANGADHARAIAH,
Digitally signed by
BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
PAVITHRA
Location: HIGH
R/AT NO.143, 2ND CROSS,
COURT OF 5TH BLOCK, 2ND STATE,
KARNATAKA
NAGARBHAVI,
BENGALURU - 560 072.
2. N. GANGADHARAIAH,
S/O. V. NAGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
R/AT NO.143, 2ND CROSS,
5TH STAGE, 2ND BLOCK,
NAGARBHAVI,
BENGALURU - 560 072.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:18681
RFA No. 575 of 2018
3. SMT. T. G. ANITHA,
D/O. N. GANGADHARAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT NO.23/2, "ASHIRWAD"
5TH CROSS, L. N. COLONY,
YESHWANTHAPURA,
BENGALURU - 560 022.
4. SMT. T. G. MAMATHA,
D/O. N. GANGADARIAH,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/AT NO.759, KCS LAYOUT,
JNANA BHARATHI POST,
BENGALURU - 560 056.
...RESPONDENTS
RFA FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 R/W SEC.96 OF
CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
01.12.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5879/2012 ON THE FILE OF
THE 42nd ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION
AND INJUNCTION AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The appeal is filed on 23.03.2018. The office has
raised 11 objections to make the appeal papers are in
orders. But till today office objections have not been
removed/complied with. Several opportunities were given
to comply with office objections, but not complied with the
same.
NC: 2024:KHC:18681
2. On earlier occasion i.e., on 24.02.2021 this
Court by detailed order has dismissed the appeal for non-
compliance of office objections/non-prosecution and for
non-payment of cost. Later on, the said order was recalled
by this Court and granted some more time to comply with
office objections, but till today the office objections were
not complied with. Today also the appellant is called out,
but remained absent.
3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-
compliance of office objections.
4. Pending IAs' if any, does not survive for
consideration and it is also dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SRA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!