Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K M Devanath vs J Manjula
2024 Latest Caselaw 6645 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6645 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2024

Karnataka High Court

K M Devanath vs J Manjula on 6 March, 2024

Author: H.P.Sandesh

Bench: H.P.Sandesh

                                             -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:9382
                                                    CRL.RP No. 1421 of 2018




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024

                                           BEFORE

                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

                      CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1421 OF 2018

                   BETWEEN:

                   K.M.DEVANATH
                   AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
                   S/O LATE K. MAYIGOWDA
                   NO.481, UPKAR LAYOUT
                   VISHWANEEDAM POST
                   BENGALURU-560091
                                                               ...PETITIONER

                               (BY SMT. SWETHA S., ADVOCATE)
                   AND:

                   J. MANJULA
                   AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
                   D/O LATE P. JAVARAYI GOWDA
                   1620, II FLOOR, III-A CROSS
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T      17TH MAIN, III MAIN
Location: HIGH     J.P.NAGAR II PHASE
COURT OF           BENGALURU-560078
KARNATAKA
                                                             ...RESPONDENT

                      (BY SRI ZULFIKIR KUMAR SHAFI, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

                        THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
                   PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
                   31.10.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXIV ADDITIONAL CITY
                   CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CH-65) BANGALORE IN
                   CRL.A.NO.33/2017   CONFIRMING    THE  JUDGMENT    AND
                   SENTENCE DATED 09.12.2016 PASSED BY THE XXI A.C.M.M.,
                   BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.4278/2016 SENTENCING TO PAY FINE
                   OF RS.5,55,000/- AND IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE, TO
                                -2-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC:9382
                                       CRL.RP No. 1421 of 2018




UNDERGO S.I FOR 12 MONTHS, AND ALSO TO PAY RS.5,000/-
TO THE STATE EXCHEQUER AND ALLOW THIS R.P BY
ACQUITTING THE PETITIONER.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                            ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner has

produced the Demand Drafts bearing No.395926 dated

01.03.2024 for Rs.4,40,000/- in the name of the Registrar

General, High Court of Karnataka. The counsel submits that

the said amount is the remaining amount out of Rs.5,55,000/-

in terms of the order passed by the Trial Court and the amount

of Rs.1,10,000/- is already deposited before the Trial Court.

2. The counsel for the revision petitioner has also

produced the Demand Draft bearing No.393589 dated

05.03.2024 for Rs.5,000/- in the name of XXII ACMM,

Bengaluru.

3. Now, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a

memo for having made the payment of Rs.1,10,000/- through

Demand Draft bearing No.292919 dated 21.02.2017 through

KIOSK of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court having deposited

NC: 2024:KHC:9382

Rs.1,10,000/-. The Registry is directed to accept the Demand

Drafts for Rs.4,40,000/- and Rs.5,000/- and the respondent to

apply for release of the amount of Rs.4,40,000/- before this

Court and also for release of the amount of Rs.1,10,000/-

which is in deposit before the Trial Court. The Registry is also

directed to transmit the Demand Draft for Rs.5,000/- which is

in favour of XXII ACMM, Bengaluru, forthwith.

4. In view of deposit of entire amount by way of

Demand Drafts by the petitioner and having considered the

submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the

petitioner is in custody, the order passed by this Court earlier is

hereby recalled and the Registry is directed to intimate this

order to the concerned Jail Authorities for release of the

petitioner, in view of entire payment made by the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. The

sentence imposed against the petitioner is modified only in

respect of payment of fine.

Sd/-

JUDGE

ST,SN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter