Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Somu @ Somasundar
2024 Latest Caselaw 6431 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6431 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2024

Karnataka High Court

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Somu @ Somasundar on 5 March, 2024

Author: Jyoti Mulimani

Bench: Jyoti Mulimani

                                                  -1-
                                                             NC: 2024:KHC:9245
                                                         MFA No. 8050 of 2016




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024

                                               BEFORE
                              THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8050 OF 2016(MV-I)

                      BETWEEN:

                      NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
                      VISHWESHWARAIAH ROAD I FLOOR,
                      # 1576 P.B.NO.84, MANDYA - 571 040.
                      NOW REPRESENTD BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER,
                      NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
                      REGIONAL OFFICE, SUBHARAM COMPLEX,
                      144, M.G.ROAD,
                      BANGALORE - 560 001.
                                                                  ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI.A.N.KRISHNASWAMY., ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    SOMU @ SOMASUNDAR
                            S/O SHIVANNA,
                            NOW AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
Digitally signed by         R/A # 70, 13-B, MAIN ROAD,
THEJASKUMAR N
Location: HIGH
                            J BLOCK, KANAKADASANAGARA,
COURT OF                    DATTAGALLI, III BLOCK,
KARNATAKA
                            MYSURU - 571 315.

                      2.    SHASHANK.H.P.
                            S/O PAPEGOWDA,
                            AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
                            R/A # 872, EIDGARA STREET,
                            H.N.PURA,
                            HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 214.
                                                               ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA.K., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
                          SRI. G.S.MURALIDHARA., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
                                -2-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:9245
                                            MFA No. 8050 of 2016




     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:17.03.2016
PASSED IN MVC NO.993/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE,
ADDITIONAL COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
MYSURU.

     THIS MISCELLAENOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                     JUDGMENT

Sri.A.N.Krishna Swamy., learned counsel for the appellant

and Sri.Manjunatha.K., learned counsel for respondent No.1

have appeared in person.

2. Though the appeal is listed today for admission,

with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, it

is heard finally.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be

referred to as per their status and rankings before the Tribunal.

4. It is the case of the claimant that on the 18th day of

November 2012 at about 5:15 pm., he was proceeding in his

two wheeler Bajaj Discover bearing Registration No.KA-10-K-

9550 with pillion riders at T.Narasipura - Bannur Road from

Athhalli towards Kunthahali Gate in cross road of

Ganiganakoppalu, at that time, the driver of Maruti Swift Car

bearing Registration No.KA-11-M-2899 came in a rash and

NC: 2024:KHC:9245

negligent manner from T.Narasipura and hit the claimant. Due

to the impact, the claimant sustained grievous injuries to his

left leg and all over the body. Immediately, he was shifted to

Bannur Government Hospital and thereafter, shifted to

K.R.Hospital, Mysuru, wherein he took treatment from

10.11.2012 to 10.12.2012 as an in-patient and underwent

operation and rod was inserted to his left leg. Contending that

the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of

the driver of Maruti Swift Car, the claimant filed claim petition

seeking compensation.

In response to the notice, the respondents appeared

through their counsel and filed separate objections and denied

the petition averments. Among other grounds, they prayed for

dismissal of the petition.

Based on the above pleadings, the Tribunal framed

Issues, parties led evidence and marked the documents. The

Tribunal vide Judgment dated:17.03.2016 partly allowed the

petition. It is this Judgment that is called into question in this

appeal on several grounds as set-out in the Memorandum of

appeal.

NC: 2024:KHC:9245

5. Learned counsel for the appellant and respondent

No.1 have urged several contentions. Heard, the contentions

urged on behalf of the respective parties and perused the

appeal papers and also the records with utmost care.

6. The point that requires consideration is whether the

Judgment passed by the Tribunal requires interference?

7. The facts are sufficiently stated and do not require

reiteration. The Tribunal extenso referred to the material on

record and awarded compensation of Rs.4,69,320/- (Rupees

Four Lakh Sixty Nine Thousand Three Hundred and Twenty

only) with 6% interest from the date of petition till its

realization.

It is noticed that the Tribunal has awarded Rs.3,28,320/-

(Rupees Three Lakh Twenty Eight Thousand Three Hundred and

Twenty only) towards Loss of future income by taking the

income as Rs.9,000/- (Rupees Nine Thousand only). This is

incorrect. Ex.P.7 is the salary slip of the claimant. A perusal of

the same reveals that the income of the claimant was

Rs.6,337/- (Rupees Six Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty

Seven only) in the month of October, 2012. Since the accident

occurred in the month of November, the Tribunal ought to have

NC: 2024:KHC:9245

considered the income at Rs.6,337/- (Rupees Six Thousand

Three Hundred and Thirty Seven only) instead Rs.9,000/-

(Rupees Nine Thousand only). Therefore, this Court deems it

appropriate to re-assess the compensation awarded towards

Loss of Future Income as under:

6,337 X 12 X 16 X 19/100 = Rs.2,31,173/-

Needless to observe that compensation awarded under

other heads remains intact. Accordingly, this Court re-

determines the compensation as under:-

1. Loss of Future Income 2,31,173 Rs.2,31,173/-

2. Pain, Shock and 30,000 Rs.30,000/- Sufferings

3. Loss of amenities of life, 10,000 Rs.10,000/- happiness and frustration

4. Conveyance, attendant 15,000 Rs.15,000/-

    charges,        food      and
    nourishment
5. Loss of income during laid               24,000            Rs.24,000/-
    of period
6. Medical expenses                         42,000            Rs.42,000/-
7. Marriage Prospectus                      10,000            Rs.10,000/-
8. Loss of expectation of life              10,000            Rs.10,000/-
                         Re-assessed compensation:           Rs.3,72,173/-

                                                           NC: 2024:KHC:9245





      Therefore,    the   claimant       is    entitled       for   re-assessed

compensation of Rs.3,72,173/- (Rupees Three Lakh Seventy

Two Thousand One Hundred and Seventy Three only).

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

and the prevailing rate of interest during the relevant time, this

Court deems it appropriate to award interest at the rate of 6%

per annum on the enhanced compensation amount from the

date of claim petition till realization.

8. Hence, the following:

ORDER

1. The Miscellaneous First appeal is

allowed in part and the Judgment

dated:17.03.2016 passed by the Addl. Small

Causes and Senior Civil Judge, Mysuru in M.V.C

No.993/2013 is modified to the extent stated

hereinabove.

2. The claimant is entitled for the

reassessed compensation of Rs.3,72,173/- (Rupees

Three Lakh Seventy Two Thousand One Hundred

and Seventy Three only) with interest at the rate of

NC: 2024:KHC:9245

6% per annum from the date of the claim petition

till the date of realization.

3. The Insurance Company has deposited a

sum of Rs.2,09,600/- (Rupees Two Lakh Nine

Thousand Six Hundred only) vide Cheque bearing

No.527562 dated:20.01.2017. The balance amount

shall be deposited by the Insurance Companies

with 6% interest within a period of two months

from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this

Judgment.

4. The Registry to draw the modified award

accordingly.

5. Office is directed to transmit the original

records and the amount in deposit if any to the

concerned Tribunal forthwith for refund of the same

to the Insurance Company.

Sd/-

JUDGE TKN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter