Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6380 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:8966
RFA No. 1310 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1310 OF 2011 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
R AKKAIAMMA @ VIJAYALAKSHMI,
W/O LATE NARAYANA MURTHY,
D/O LATE T C RANGASWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT NO.33/1, JORIPET,
CHIKKANNAMMA TEMPLE STREET,
BANGALORE - 560 002,
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.12, UPSTAIRS,
14TH CROSS, CUBBONPET, BANGALORE - 560 002.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI R AKKAIAMMA @ VIJAYALAKSHMI, APPELLANT
(ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally
signed by 1. SMT PADMAMMA,
PRAMILA G V
W/O LATE DHRUVANARAYANA
Location:
HIGH COURT SINCE DEAD LEAVING BEHIND,
OF RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 AS HER LRS.
KARNATAKA
2. D VIJAYA KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
S/O LATE R DHRUVANARAYANA
3. D SRINIVASA
S/O LATE R DHRUVANARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 ARE
R/AT NO.31, 13TH CROSS, CUBBONPET,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:8966
RFA No. 1310 of 2011
BANGALORE-560002,
PRESENTLY R/AT 518 3RD CROSS,
SRINAGARA, BANGALORE-560050.
4. D HEMAVATHI,
W/O SHIVAKUMAR,
D/O LATE R DHRUVANARAYANA,
AGED ABOUT YEARS
TH
R/AT 518, 7 MAIN SRINAGARA,
BANGALORE- 560050.
5. R VISWANATHA,
S/O T C RANGASWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT NO.1971, DEVANGA ROAD, NELAMANGALA,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,
PRESENTLY R/AT R VISWANATH,
C/O G GANGARAJU WEAVERS COLONY,
LAST HOUSE OF YEELLAMMA NAGARA,
NELAMANGALA.
6. MUNILAKSHMI,
W/O KRISHNAPPA,
S/O T C RANGASWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/AT OPP PADMASHALA CHOULTY,
DEVARAJA NAGAR, DODDABALLAPURA,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
7. M LAKSHMI NARAYANA
S/O LATE H MARIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT NO.64, SIDDANNA LANE,
CUBBONPET CROSS, BANGALORE-560002.
...RESPONDENTS
(R1 - DEAD AS PER CAUSE TITLE,
R3, R4, R6 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED,
SRI S V MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R7)
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:8966
RFA No. 1310 of 2011
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.04.2011
PASSED IN O.S.116/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII-ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-44, BANGALORE,
DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR THE PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for the appellant was permitted to
retire from the case vide order dated 29.02.2024. Thereafter,
the name of the appellant was ordered to be shown in the
cause-list.
2. Appellant's name is shown in the cause-list. There
is no appearance on behalf of the appellant in the morning
session as well as in the afternoon session. Appeal is of the
year 2011. This Court does not find any justifiable reasons to
adjourn the matter.
3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE GVP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!