Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12884 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:20546
CRL.P No. 4517 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4517 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. H.HANUMANTHAPPA
S/O LATE M.HANUMANTHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT: #367, HALE KUNDAWADA VILLAGE,
DAVANAGERE TALUK,
DISTRICT - 577001
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KUMARA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY KTJ NAGAR POLICE STATION,
KTJ NAGAR,
DAVANAGERE - 577001
Digitally signed 2. SRI.N.ESWARIAH
by NAGAVENI S/O NAGAPPA
Location: HIGH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA RET P.S.I. BELLARY,
C/O KUNDHUWADA VILLAGE,
DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT,
JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESH, ADDL.SPP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 IN
C.C.NO.1043/2021 AND ORDERS OF COGNIZANCE TAKEN FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 177, 420, 465, 468, 471 R/W 34 OF IPC AGAINST
THE PETITIONER ON 24.03.2021 ON THE FILE OF J.M.F.C.-II,
DAVANAGERE.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:20546
CRL.P No. 4517 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following
prayer:
"i) Quash the proceedings against the petitioner / accused No.1, in C.C.No.1043/2021 and orders of cognizance taken for the offences punishable under section 177, 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w 34 of IPC against the petitioner on 24.03.2021 on the files of J.M.F.C.II, Davanagere.
ii) Pass any other suitable order's as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. The husband and the wife were before the Division
Bench in M.F.A.No.2399/2015 and have settled the dispute
before the division bench. The term of the settlement is
closure of the present proceedings. The order of the division
bench recording compromise reads as follows:
"3. The learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that during pendency of the appeal, the parties have amicably resolved the differences between themselves. Learned counsel for the parties have also invited attention of this Court to the application filed by
NC: 2024:KHC:20546
the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC. The terms and conditions of the compromise entered into between the parties are reads as under:
"3. The appellant and respondent submit that, as a gesture to the compromise the respondent has paid Sum of Rs.1,75,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Seventy Five Thousand Only) as permeant alimony to the appellant as full and fina settlement by way of3demand draft bearing No.910624 Drawn on Union Bank, Mandipet DavagereBranch.
4. The appellant and respondent submit that, in view of the settlement arrived between the parties the respondent has agreed to withdraw the following cases filed by the respondent before the varies courts.
5. The Appellant has agree to withdraw the allegations the case inC.C.No.1250/2018 for the offences punishable under section 498(A), 506,114 R/w 34 of IPC and 34 of Dowry and Prohibition Act, the same is pending on the files of before the IIrd Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Davanagere and the appellant agreed to compromise the same byb filing compromise petition before the Hon'ble IIrd Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Davanagere.
6. The appellant and respondent further submit that , the appellant is also agreed to withdraw the case inC.C.No.5470/2021, for the offences punishable under section 177, 420, 465,468, 471, 34 of IPC, pending on the files of the IIIrd Additional Civil Judge and JMFC. Davanagere, filed by the father of the appellant by filing compromise petition.
NC: 2024:KHC:20546
7. The Appellant and respondent further submit that, further the Appellant is also agreed to withdraw the case inCrl.Misc.No.244/2021, pending on the files of Principal Judge Family Court at Ballari filed by the appellant against therespondent.
8. The appellant and respondent submit that, they have no children born out of their wedlock.
9. The appellant and respondent submit that, the both the parties have no claims over the movable and immovable properties either existing or to be acquired in future. Further they have no other claim of whatsoever in any manner against each other either past, present or future."
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant has acknowledged the receipt of a sum of1,75,000/- by way of demand draft dated 29.10.2022.
5. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the judgment and decree dated28.2.2015 passed by the Family Court in M.CNo.119/2013 is modified to the extent mentioned above and the marriage between the parties is dissolved by a decree of divorce and the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties."
3. In the light of the division bench recording the
compromise and closing the proceedings, which also contains
the condition of closure of these proceedings, I deem it
appropriate to terminate the proceedings against this petitioner.
NC: 2024:KHC:20546
4. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
i) The criminal petitions stands disposed.
ii) The proceedings in C.C.No.1043/2021 pending on the file of J.M.F.C., (II Court) Davanagere, stand quashed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!