Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12690 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:19759
MFA No. 2355 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2355 OF 2018 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SHASHIDHAR @ SHASHIKUMAR
S/O KAMBEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
BASAVAGATTA VILLAGE,
DUDDA HOBLI,
HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573201.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. KAVITHA H.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SURESH P K
S/O KENGEGOWDA,
POOMAGAME VILLAGE,
HONNAVARA POST
HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT.
2. THE MANAGER
Digitally signed by B
K
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.,
MAHENDRAKUMAR CHANDANA COMPLEX, HARSHA MAHAL HOTEL ROAD,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF HASSAN-573201.
KARNATAKA ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GEETHA RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R-2;
V/O DATED 21.07.2022 NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENCED WITH)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT 1988 AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.02.2017 PASSED IN MVC
NO.1218/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE & MACT, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:19759
MFA No. 2355 of 2018
JUDGMENT
This appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenges the award dated 23rd February 2017 in MVC No. 1218/2014, passed by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Hassan.
2. The appellant filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the MV Act, stating that he sustained injuries in a road traffic accident. He was riding his motorcycle when the rider of the offending vehicle, driving in a rash and negligent manner, collided with his bike from the opposite direction. The Tribunal, after evaluating the evidence on record, attributed composite negligence equally (50% each) to the claimant and the rider of the offending vehicle. This conclusion was based on the fact that the charge sheet was filed against both parties. Consequently, the Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.78,000, after deducting 50% due to the claimant's share of the negligence. The claimant has filed this appeal, taking exception to the Tribunal's decision.
3. The parties' learned counsel were heard.
4. The accident occurred in 2013, and at that time, the claimant was 26 years old. In the absence of proof of income, the claimant's notional income is assessed at Rs.8,500 per month, as opposed to the Rs.6,000 per month assessed by the Tribunal. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is recalculated for loss of future income and other relevant categories, considering the nature
NC: 2024:KHC:19759
of the injuries sustained. The revised compensation amounts are as follows:
Pain and sufferings Rs.70,000/-
Medical expenses, conveyance, Rs.68,000/- food and nourishment charges
Loss of income during laid up Rs.24,000/-
period Loss of amenities Rs.30,000/- Total Rs. Rs.1,92,000/-
Less contributory negligence of Rs.96,000/- as against Rs.78,000/- 50% from the petitioner
5. The petitioner is entitled for total compensation of Rs.96,000/- as against Rs.78,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. The enhanced compensation amount of Rs.18,000/- shall carry interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till the actual date of realization.
6. The enhanced compensation amount with interest to be deposited by the respondent - Insurance Company within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. To this extent, stands modified. Appeal allowed in part.
Sd/-
JUDGE
BKM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!