Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 900 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:579
MFA No. 101422 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101422 OF 2021 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
GENERAL MANAGER,
SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
10003-E-8, RICHO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPUR,
RAJASTAN STATE,
NOW REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,
SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
BENGALURU.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. M.Y. KATAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. NINGAPPA S/O. YALLAPPA METTI,
AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURAL,
R/O. MYADANERI, TALUKA: YELBURGA,
DISTRICT: KOPPAL-583237.
2. NOORANDAPPA
SAROJA S/O. ERAPPA BOODANAYAKADINNI,
HANGARAKI AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER CUM
Digitally signed by
SAROJA
OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING
HANGARAKI
Date: 2024.01.25
11:44:39 +0530
REG. NO.KA-22/9344,
R/O. SUTAGUNDAR, TALUKA AND
DISTRICT: BAGALKOTE
PIN CODE-587115.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ANKIT R.DESAI, ADVOCATE)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 29.02.2020 PASSED IN MVC
NO.54/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MOTOR
ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, YELBURG, AWARDING
COMPENSATION OF Rs.5,94,224/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT
P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS DEPOSIT.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:579
MFA No. 101422 of 2021
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.M.Y.Katagi and Sri.Ankith Desai, learned
counsel.
2. Appeal is by the insurance company challenging the
quantum of compensation awarded in MVC No.54/2017.
3. Sri.M.Y.Katagi submits that there is no dispute as to
the accidental injuries sustained by the claimants.
However, in the absence of proper proof of income, the
Tribunal was justified in assessing the monthly income in a
sum of Rs.7,000/-. So also, tribunal has erred in applying
multiplier 17, having regard to the fact that the injured
was 35 years old. Proper multiplier should be 16 and
therefore, need has been arisen to reassess the
compensation.
4. Sri.Ankith Desai, however submits that on the head
of transportation and nourishment charges no proper
NC: 2024:KHC-D:579
compensation is awarded and therefore, sought for
dismissal of the appeal.
5. In view of the rival contentions of the parties, this
court has perused the material available on record
meticulously.
6. On such perusal of the material on record, it has
been established by the claimant that he has sustained
accidental injuries in road traffic accident that occurred on
26.06.2009 at about 9.30 p.m. involving Auto rickshaw
bearing No.KA22/9344.
7. Injured has been inpatient and he has sustained two
fractures and he is treated in SDM Medical college hospital
and medical records have been placed on record to
substantiate the injuries sustained by him.
8. In the absence of treated doctor has been examined
before the tribunal, tribunal justified in assessing the
disability factor by taking 1/3 of the disability factor
mentioned in the disability certificate.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:579
9. The monthly income that has been taken by the
tribunal is in a sum of Rs.7,000/- for the accidental
injuries of the year 2009, in the absence of proper proof of
income.
10. Tribunal has erred in applying 17 multiplier as the
injured is aged 35 years as on the date of accident.
11. Accordingly, the case has been made out by the
insurance company for reassessment of the compensation.
12. The quantum of compensation is thus reassessed as
under:
Sl.No. Name of heads Amount(Rs.) 1 Loss of future earning capacity 2,23,680-00 (Rs.5,000X12X16X23.3%) 2 Pain and suffering 50,000-00 3 Amenities 15,000-00 4 Medical expenses 1,86,500-00 5 Attendant charges 10,000-00 6 For nourishment 10,000-00 7 Laid up period income 15,000-00 Total 5,10,180-00
NC: 2024:KHC-D:579
13. In view of the foregoing discussion, the following :
ORDER
i) Appeal is allowed in part.
ii) As against compensation of 5,94,224-00
awarded by the tribunal claimant is entitled for
the sum of Rs.5,10,180-00 with interest at 6%
per annum.
iii) Amount in deposit is ordered to be
transmitted to the tribunal.
iv) The balance amount of compensation if
any be deposited within a period of 4 weeks in
the pending execution.
v) Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HMB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!