Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 338 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:152
RPFC No. 200015 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 200015 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
SRI. SAJNEEVKUMAR @ SANJU
S/O HONNAPPA DHANAGOND,
AGE 29 YEARS, OCC : DRIVER AND AGRI,
R/O. HONAWAD, TQ. TIKOTA,
DIST. VIJAYAPURA - 586128.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANGANABASAVA B. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. POOJA W/O SANJEEVKUMAR
Digitally signed @ SANJU DHANAGOND,
by SACHIN AGE : 24 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEHOLD WORK,
Location: HIGH R/O C/O HONNAPPA PUJARI,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA SAMADEVAHATTI, TQ. TIKOTA,
DIST. VIJAYAPUR-586101.
...RESPONDENT
THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS
ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND
ORDER DATED 02.03.2021 PASSED IN CRL. MISC.
NO.43/2020 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY
COURT, VIJAYAPURA BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE SAID
REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:152
RPFC No. 200015 of 2021
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. This petition is filed challenging the order dated
02.03.2021 in Crl.Misc.No.43/2020 on the file of I
Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Vijayapura
awarding maintenance of `6,000/- per month to the
respondent.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner, the perusal of the impugned order would
indicate that the notice was served on the petitioner,
however he remained absent. Looking into the finding
recorded by the Family Court, there is no dispute with
regard to the marriage between the petitioner and the
respondent.
4. It is also forthcoming from the impugned order
that the petitioner is having immovable properties and he
is cultivating the same. In that view of the matter, taking
into account the fact that the petitioner is residing along
with her parents, I am of the view of that the grant of
NC: 2024:KHC-K:152
maintenance of `6,000/- by the Family Court is just and
proper and does not call for interference. Accordingly,
petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!