Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 203 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:248
RSA No. 3429 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 3429 OF 2006 (RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI K.M. ESHWARAPPA
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.
1. SMT.DEVAMMA
W/O. LATE K.M.ESHWARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
R/O. CHANDRAHASA NILAYA
BEHIND I.B. NEHRU NAGAR
ANAVATTI POST, ANNAVATTI
SORABA TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA-577 413.
2. K.E.KRISHNAPPA
S/O. LATE K.M. ESHWARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
Digitally signed ASSISTANT DRIVER
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH R/O. H.NO.20/2, 2ND COLONY
COURT OF AMBIKA NAGAR
KARNATAKA AMBIKANAGAR POST
DANDELI TALUK.
UTTARA KANNADA-577 412.
3. K.E. PARASHURAMA
S/O. LATE K.M.ESHWARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/O. CHANDRAHASA NILAYA
BEHIND I.B. NEHRU NAGAR
ANAVATTI POST, ANNAVATTI
SORABA TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA-577 413.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:248
RSA No. 3429 of 2006
4. K.E. KALLESH
S/O. LATE K.M. ESHWARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
BEHIND GAJIBIJI GUDDAPPA'S HOUSE
CHELUVADIYARA STREET
NEHRU NAGAR
ANAVATTI POST, ANNAVATTI
SORABA TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA-577 413.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K. SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI KARIYAPPA
S/O. HONNAPPA
KUNCHTEGARE
MAJOR
R/O. KUBATOOR VILLAGE
ANAVATTI HOBLI
SORABA TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA-577 413.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI S.V.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 30.9.2006 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.363/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER,
FAST TRACK COURT-II, SHIVAMOGGA, ALLOWING THE
APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE
DATED 23.12.1995 PASSED IN OS.NO.103/1989 ON THE FILE
OF THE MUNSIFF & JMFC, SORABA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants is absent.
NC: 2024:KHC:248
2. This matter was listed on 14.09.2023 and on that
day also, learned counsel for the appellants was absent. This
Court has noted that matter was called out in the pre-lunch
session, there was no representation on behalf of the
appellants and learned counsel for the respondent was present.
It is also noted that again, the matter was called at 3.27 p.m.,
even then also, no representation on behalf of the appellants.
However, in order to give one more opportunity, ordered to list
the matter on 21.09.2023. When the matter was listed on
21.09.2023, the matter was not reached and learned counsel
for the appellants is not pursuing the matter diligently. Hence,
there are no grounds to adjourn the matter once again.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!