Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1399 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:1968
RFA No. 1377 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1377 OF 2020 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SMT MUNIYAMMA
W/O LATE CHOWDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.52/2
8TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN
MALLESHPALYA, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST
BANGALORE-560075.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. BHARATHI M.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. SRI RANGASWAMAIAH
S/O LATE RANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
Digitally signed
by RESIDING AT NO.3, 3RD MAIN
DHANALAKSHMI 3RD CROSS, MALLESHPALYA
MURTHY
NEW THIPPASANDA POST
Location: High
Court of BANGALORE-560075.
Karnataka
2. SATHYANARAYANA
S/O LATE SUBBAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
3. SMT LALITHA
D/O LATE SUBBAIAH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
4. SRI YUVARAJ
S/O LATE SUBBAIAH
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:1968
RFA No. 1377 of 2020
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R2 TO R4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.140
K H RANGANATHA COLONY
J J R NAGAR, NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE
BANGALORE-560018.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GANESH BHAT Y H., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.12.2019
PASSED IN OS.NO.587/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-38) BANGALORE,
DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
When the matter was posted before the Registrar for
compliance of office objections, for the fifth time, none
appeared for the appellant and the office objections have
not been complied with.
2. On 08.01.2024, the matter was posted before the
Court for compliance of office objections. None appeared
for the appellant in both the sessions and the office
objections have not been complied with. Hence, the
matter was ordered to be posted on 09.01.2024 at the top
of the list for 'orders'.
NC: 2024:KHC:1968
3. Even on 09.01.2024, when the matter was called
in both the sessions, none appeared for the appellant and
the office objections have not been complied with and the
matter was ordered to be posted to today at the top of the
list under the caption 'for dismissal'.
4. Today, when the matter is called in both the
sessions, none appeared for the appellant and the office
objections have not been complied with. It appears that
the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
5. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default and non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!