Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1365 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:2064
WP No. 29847 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO.29847 OF 2014 (LA-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. D.R. ASHWATH
S/O LATE D. RAMAKRISHNA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/O. NO.48, 80TH CROSS
I PHASE, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT
BANGALORE-560 078.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI P.N. NANJA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
Digitally
signed by V 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MANJUSHA TUMKUR-572 102.
BAI
Location: 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
High Court & LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
of Karnataka
TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION, TUMKUR-572 102.
4. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER
KARNATAKA TELECOM CIRCLE
TELECOM CIRCLE, M.G. ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R.1 TO R.3;
SRI Y. HARIPRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R.4)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:2064
WP No. 29847 of 2014
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
LAND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN RESPECT OF
THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.111/3B MEASURING
290+264+116+74/2 (26,315 SQ.FT.) SITUATED AT TUMKUR,
KASABA HOBLI PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION NO.LAQ SR 28/88-89 DATED 22.10.1988 AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION NO.RD-78 AQ.90 DATED 05.02.1991 AS
PER ANNEXURES-B & D RESPECTIVELY ARE LAPSED IN VIEW
OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE AMENDED LAND ACQUISITION ACT
RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND
ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT,
2013 AND RELEASE THE ABOVE SAID LAND TO THE
PETITIONER ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THROUGH
PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. The writ petition pertains to acquisition of land situated
in Survey No.111/3B measuring about 26,315 square feet at
Tumkur. The said acquisition was challenged before this
Court and the acquisition has been upheld. The petitioner
has filed the instant writ petition with a prayer to declare
the acquisition as being lapsed in the light of him not
receiving the compensation.
2. The said averment of the petitioner is disputed by the
respondents and it is submitted that the petitioner was a
party to the proceedings in LAC No.13/2003 on the file of the
Principal Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Tumakuru and the said
NC: 2024:KHC:2064
proceedings pertains to the compensation deposited in
respect of lands which are the subject matter of the writ
petition along with few other lands.
3. A copy of the judgment rendered in LAC No.13/2003 is
also produced before this Court.
4. For the aforementioned reason, the writ petition is
hereby dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
hkh.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!