Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1080 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:1581
RFA No. 860 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 860 OF 2009 (MON)
BETWEEN:
M/S. LAXMI SILKS,
NO.30, 1ST FLOOR,
JUMMA MASJID ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 002.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,
SRI SANJEEV JAIN.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI K VISHWANATH & SRI D.N.ARUN KUMAR,
ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. CITI BANK N.A.,
SHAKTI TOWERS,
NO.766, ANNASAIAI,
Digitally signed by
VIJAYALAKSHMI CHENNAI.
BN
Location: High
Court of 2. THE MANAGER,
Karnataka
M/S CITI BANK,
M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V S RAVI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2008, -PASSED IN
O.S.NO.1384/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT
FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:1581
RFA No. 860 of 2009
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents
is present and submits that initially this appeal was heard
by this Court and by order dated 23.07.2015, this Court
found that the matter has to be remitted back to the trial
Court. The order of this Court is as below:
"Hence, the matter is remitted to the court below only to address this particular issue and permit the parties to tender evidence, if any, in this regard. The Court below shall after recording such additional evidence shall also record its findings thereon and the reasons therefore and to remit the record to this Court within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The parties shall appear before the Court below without any further notice on 10.08.2015 and the Registry is directed to remit the record to the Court below."
NC: 2024:KHC:1581
3. When the matter was taken up by the trial
Court, the parties entered into a settlement and filed a
joint memo, whereby, the defendants paid a sum of
Rs.2,13,300/- by way of Demand Draft dated 07.08.2015
and the claim made by the plaintiff was settled.
Accordingly, a joint memo was filed before the trial Court
on 31.08.2015. In pursuance to the said memo, the trial
Court disposed off the matter as settled out of Court.
4. In view of such settlement recorded by the trial
Court, the present appeal would not survive. Hence, the
appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NR/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!