Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1066 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:1547
RFA No. 1485 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1485 OF 2020 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. T. NAGARAJ
S/O LATE THIMMARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 1
EAST END D MAIN ROAD
JAYANAGARA 9TH BLOCK
BENGALURU 560069.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. ADINARAYANA.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. SRI. MUNEGOWDA
S/O LATE YELLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
Digitally signed
by
DHANALAKSHMI 2. SMT SUSHEELAMMA
MURTHY W/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA
Location: High
Court of AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
Karnataka
3. KRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE YELLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO 43
2ND MAIN, PUTTAIAH PALYA
9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA
BENGALURU 560069.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GURU PRASAD R.,ADVOCATE C/R1:
SRI. H.V.MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:1547
RFA No. 1485 of 2020
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 R/W
SEC.96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 31.01.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.78/2009 ON THE FILE
OF THE XXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Inspite of granting opportunity for six times, the office
objections have not been complied with.
2. Even when the matter was posted before the Registrar
for compliance of office objections, none appeared for the
appellant. Even the matter was posted before the Court for
compliance of office objections on 08.01.2024, none appeared
for the appellant in both the sessions and office objections have
not been complied with and the matter was ordered to be listed
on 10.01.2024 at the top of the list for 'orders'. Even on
10.01.2024 also none appeared for the appellant in both the
sessions and the office objections have not been complied with
and the matter was ordered to be listed to today at the top of
the list under the caption 'for dismissal'.
3. Even today also there is no representation on behalf of
the appellant in both the sessions and the office objections
NC: 2024:KHC:1547
have not been complied with. It appears that the appellant is
not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default and non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!