Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6028 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:8305
WP No. 4348 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 4348 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SUHAS R.R.,
S/O R.D.RAMESH RAO
SRI SEETRAM MEDICALS
SHIVAMOGGA, B.H.ROAD,
SHIVAMOGGA.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE CHIEF MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA,
MAIN BRANCH, SHAROFF COMPLEX,
SRI M.V.ROAD
Digitally signed SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201.
by NAGAVENI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 2. REGIONAL MANAGER
KARNATAKA STATE BANK OF INDIA
GRADUATE CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETY BUILDING UPSTAIRS
KUVEMPU ROAD,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201.
3. CHIEF MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
STRESSED ASSETS
RECOVERY BRANCH
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:8305
WP No. 4348 of 2024
3RD FLOOR, BUILDING NO. 11/90
OPP. TO TRUST WELL HOSPITALS
NEAR OLD SHIVAJI THEATRE
J.C.ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 002.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K.V.LOKESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH NOTICE ISSUED U/S 13(2) OF THE SECURITISATION
AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND
ENFORCEMENT OF THE SECURITY INTEREST ACT 2022 OF
BOTH THE LOAN ACCOUNT BEARING A/C NO. CC/32113423885
DTD 26.12.2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND THE LOAN
ACCOUNT BEARING A/C NO. CC/31561701020 DTD 26.12.2023
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D1 ISSUED BY THE R-3 AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by
issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus the respondents
- bank to consider his representation for acceptance of OTS
proposal.
2. Heard Sri Devi Prasad Shetty, learned counsel for
petitioner and Sri K.V.Lokesh, learned counsel for respondents.
NC: 2024:KHC:8305
3. This Court would not issue a mandamus to the bank to
consider the OTS proposal of any borrower in terms of the
judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the case of STATE
BANK OF INDIA VS ARVINDRA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.
reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 1522. It is for the borrower
to submit a representation to the bank and the bank to
consider the representation and pass necessary orders.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents - bank would
submit that it is already considered and intimation is sent to
the borrower to improve his offer and submit a new proposal.
5. It that be so, it is for the borrower and the bank and
not to draw this Court in the loop of OTS between the bank and
the borrower.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stand
dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!