Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rudragouda vs Vittal Todakar
2024 Latest Caselaw 5799 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5799 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Rudragouda vs Vittal Todakar on 26 February, 2024

                                                     -1-
                                                             NC: 2024:KHC-D:4539
                                                              MFA No. 101200 of 2016




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                                DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                                    BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
                           MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101200 OF 2016 (MV)

                      BETWEEN:

                      RUDRAGOUDA
                      S/O. IRANAGOUDA MUDIGOUDAR,
                      AGE: 38 YEARS,
                      OCC: OWNER OF VEHICLE,
                      R/O: AMARGOL VILLAGE,
                      TALUK: NAVALGUND.
                                                                          ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI. LAXMESH PUTTA, ADV. FOR
                          SRI. LAXMAN C. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.     SRI. VITTAL TODAKAR,
                             AGE: 61 YEARS,
                             OCC: SERVICE,
         Digitally
         signed by           R/O: MACHAKANUR,
         JAGADISH
JAGADISH T R                 TALUK: MUDHOL,
TR       Date:
         2024.02.27          NOW AT HUBLI.
         10:55:23
         +0530

                      2.     SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
                             E/8, EPIP RIICO,
                             INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPUR,
                             JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN.

                      3.     SMT. BHEEMAVVA W/O. DYAMAPPA
                             @ DYAMANNA SHIDNEKOPPA,
                             AGE: 26 YEARS,
                             OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
                             R/O: SHANWAD,
                             TALWAR ONI,
                              -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:4539
                                      MFA No. 101200 of 2016




     TALUK: NAVALGUND,
     NOW AT C/O. S. Y. GOVINDAN,
     RTD, J. E. BANASHANKARI EXTN,
     VIDYANAGAR, HUBLI.

4.   SRI. FAKIRAPPA S/O. SIDDAPPA
     SHIDNEKOPPA,
     AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
     R/O. SHANWAD, TALWAR ONI,
     TALUK: NAVALGUND,
     NOW AT C/O. S. Y. GOVINDAN,
     RTD. J. E. BANASHANKARI EXTN.
     VIDYANAGAR, HUBLI.

5.   SMT. KASTURI W/O. FAKKIRAPPA
     SHIDNEKOPPA,
     AGE: 55 YEARS,
     OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
     R/O: SHANWAD, TALWAR ONI,
     TALUK: NAVALGUND,
     NOW AT C/O. S. Y. GOVINDAN,
     RTD, J. E. BANASHANKARI EXTN,
     VIDYANAGAR, HUBLI.

6.   THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD,
     DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
     SRINATH COMPLEX,
     NCM, HUBLI.

                                              ...RESPONDENTS

      THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND
JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE HON'BLE PRL. SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. M.A.C.T HUBLI, AT: HUBLI, IN M.V.C.
NO.1011/2013, MAY KINDLY BE SET ASIDE BY ALLOWING THIS
APPEAL.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                               -3-
                                    NC: 2024:KHC-D:4539
                                      MFA No. 101200 of 2016




                            ORDER

This Court vide order dated 01.03.2018 recalled the

order dated 10.11.2016 by condoning delay of 317 days in

filing the recalling application subject to payment of cost of

Rs.500/- to the Advocates' Association Library Fund, High

Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad.

2. Matter is called in the morning as well as in the

afternoon session. There is no representation on behalf of

the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not

interested to prosecute the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

RKM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter