Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karnataka State Medical vs Plasti Surge Industires Pvt Ltd
2024 Latest Caselaw 5759 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5759 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Karnataka State Medical vs Plasti Surge Industires Pvt Ltd on 26 February, 2024

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar

Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar

                                                    -1-
                                                                  NC: 2024:KHC:7924
                                                               WP No. 5362 of 2024




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                                  BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 5362 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
                      BETWEEN:

                      KARNATAKA STATE MEDICAL
                      SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD.,
                      REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,
                      MR. KOTRESH H,
                      A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
                      THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956,
                      HAVING ITS REGISTERED PURANIK,
                      KHB COLONY, MAGADI ROAD,
                      BENGALURU - 560 079.
                                                                        ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
                         SRI. PRASHANTH H.S, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      PLASTI SURGE INDUSTIRES PVT. LTD.,
                      REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956,
Digitally signed by
                      A-70, MIDC INDUSTRIAL AREA,
VANDANA S             PB NO. 95, AMRAVATI,
Location: High
Court of Karnataka    MAHARASTRA - 444 607,
                      REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
                      MR. DHRUV DAGA
                                                                       ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. CHRISTOPHER EDWIN, ADVOCATE
                         M/S. KOCHHAR AND CO.)

                             THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XIII RULE 1 READ
                      WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, 1908 R/W ARTICLE 226 OF THE
                      CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN
                      COMM EXECUTION PETITION BEARING 517/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE
                                -2-
                                              NC: 2024:KHC:7924
                                           WP No. 5362 of 2024




OF LXXXVII THE ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL COURT, COMMERCIAL COURT
COMPLEX, (CCH-88) BANGALORE AND ETC.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                             ORDER

This petition by the judgment debtor in Com.Ex.No.517/2023

is directed against the impugned order dated 06.02.2024 passed

by the Commercial Court, which directed issuance of attachment

warrant against the petitioner - judgment debtor in the said

Execution proceedings.

2. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and

learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on

record.

3. The material on record discloses that the respondent-

Decree holder instituted the aforesaid execution proceedings

against the petitioner-Judgment Debtor to enforce the arbitral

award dated 05.12.2022 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal. During the

pendency of the said execution proceedings, the judgment debtor

deposited a sum of Rs.65,00,000/- (Rupees Sixty Five Lakhs only)

before the Executing court. Thereafter, on 06.02.2024, the

NC: 2024:KHC:7924

petitioner-Judgment Debtor filed the statement of objections to the

main execution petition putting forth various contentions and

sought for dismissal of the petition. It is the grievance of the

petitioner that despite filing the statement of objections on

06.02.2024 itself, the Executing court has not considered the same

and proceeded to pass the impugned order attaching the movables

of the petitioner-Judgment Debtor, who is before this Court by way

of present petition.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits

that in the light of the undisputed fact that arbitral award has not

been challenged by the petitioner so far, the question of

entertaining any objection of the petitioner-judgment debtor would

not arise and as such, the petition is not maintainable and the

same is liable to be dismissed.

5. I have given my anxious consideration to the rival

submissions and perused the material on record.

6. Though several contentions have been urged by both

sides, having regard to the undisputed fact that the petitioner had

filed statement of objections to the main execution petition on

06.02.2024, which has not been considered by the Executing court

NC: 2024:KHC:7924

before passing the impugned order of attachment, without

expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the rival

contentions and to provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to

both parties, I deem it appropriate to set aside the impugned order

dated 06.02.2024 and direct the Executing court to consider and

pass appropriate order on or before 26.04.2024 by taking into

account / consideration the statement of objections filed by the

petitioner and after hearing both sides in accordance with law.

7. In the result, I pass the following:-

ORDER

(i) Petition is hereby allowed.

(ii) The impugned order dated 06.02.2024 passed by the

Executing court in Com.Ex.No.517/2023 directing attachment of

movables of the petitioner is hereby set aside.

(iii) The matter is remitted back to the Executing court for

reconsideration afresh by taking into account / consideration the

statement of objections filed by the petitioner and hear both sides

and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on or before

26.04.2024.

NC: 2024:KHC:7924

(iv) All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept

open and no opinion is expressed on the same.

(v) At the instance/request of the learned counsel for the

respondent-Decree holder, the amount of Rs.65 Lakhs already

deposited by the petitioner-Judgment Debtor before the Executing

court is directed to be released/disbursed in favour of respondent-

Decree holder without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the

parties and making it subject to the final outcome of the Execution

proceedings.

SD/-

JUDGE

SNC/SRL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter