Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vijaya Kumar Shambulinga ... vs Smt. Parvati W/O.Shreeshail Hosamani, ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 5589 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5589 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Vijaya Kumar Shambulinga ... vs Smt. Parvati W/O.Shreeshail Hosamani, ... on 22 February, 2024

                                         -1-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC-D:4332
                                                    RSA No. 5657 of 2010




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                    DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                      BEFORE

                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.NATARAJ

                  REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.5657/2010(DEC/INJ)

            BETWEEN:

            1.   SRI VIJAYA KUMAR SHAMBULINGA
                 PATTANASHETTI,
                 [SINCE DECEASED BY LR'S]

            2.   SMT. SHIVALEELA
                 W/O.VIJAYA KUMAR PATTANASHETTI,
                 AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
                 R/O: OPPOSITE TO GOVERNMENT
                 JUNIOR COLLEGE GOKAK - 590 004.

            3.   SANDEEP S/O. VIJAYA KUMAR
                 PATTANASHETTI, AGE: 21 YEAR,
                 OCC: NIL, R/O: OPPOSITE TO GOVERNMENT
                 JUNIOR COLLEGE GOKAK - 590 004.

            4.   PRAVEEN
                 S/O.VIJAYA KUMAR PATTANASHETTI,
                 AGE: 16 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
Digitally
signed by        MINOR REPRESENTED BY
VINAYAKA         NATURAL MOTHER A-1(A).
BV

            5.   RAHUL
                 S/O.VIJAYA KUMAR PATTANASHETTI,
                 AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
                 R/O: OPPOSITE TO GOVERNMENT
                 JUNIOR COLLEGE GOKAK - 590 004.
                                                            ...APPELLANTS
            (BY SRI C. R. MENSINKAI, ADVOCATE)

            AND:

            1.   SMT. PARVATI W/O.SHREESHAIL HOSAMANI,
                 AGE: MAJOR, OCC: MEDICAL PRACTIONER,
                 R/O: GOKAK - 590 004.
                               -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:4332
                                        RSA No. 5657 of 2010




     SHRI APPASAHEB BALU BADNIKAI,
     AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
     R/O: VIDYANAGAR, GOKAK,
     SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S.

2.   SMT. CHAMPAKKA
     W/O. APPASAHEB BADINIKAI,
     AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
     R/O: VIDYANAGAR, GOKAK.

3.   SHRI BABASAHEB APPASAHEB BADNIKAI,
     AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O: VIDYANAGAR, GOKAK.

4.   SMT. BHARATI W/O. PRAKASH NAIK,
     AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
     R/O: DARYRM, TALUKA: ATHANI,
     DIST: BELAGAVI.

5.   NARENDRA APPASAHEB BADNIKAI,
     AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
     R/O: VIDYANAGAR, GOKAK.

6.   SMT. KAMALAVVA W/O. SHAMBULINGAPPA
     PATTANASHETTI,
     AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
     R/O: OPP TO GOVERNMENT JUNIOR
     COLLEGE GOKAK - 590 004.
     SINCE DECEASED

     APPELLANTS ARE TREATED
     LR'S OF DECEASED R6;
                                              ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI A.S.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI RAVI S. BALIKAI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R5;
APPELLANTS ARE TREATED LR'S OF DECEASED R6)

      THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
21.04.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.278/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE II -
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BELAGAVI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL,
FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.12.2008 AND THE
DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.26/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE IIND -
ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) GOKAK, DISMISSING THE SUIT
FILED FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION.
                               -3-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:4332
                                          RSA No. 5657 of 2010




     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                            ORDER

A memo of retirement is filed by the learned counsel

for the appellants. This memo is counter signed by the

appellants. Therefore, the learned counsel for the

appellants is permitted to retire. Office is directed to

delete the name of learned counsel Sri. Madanmohan M.

Khannur and Sri. C R. Mensinkai from the cause list and

show the names of the appellants in the cause list.

2. Despite grant of indulgence to take steps to

bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent

No.1 no steps are taken till date. The deceased

respondent No.1 before this Court was the plaintiff before

the trial court while the other respondents were the other

defendants. As a result, the appeal stands abated not only

against the respondent No.1 but also against the other

respondents. Hence, this appeal stands disposed off as

having abated.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:4332

3. In view of the disposal of the appeal as abated,

I.A Nos.1/2019 to 3/2019 does not survive for

consideration for the present.

SD/-

JUDGE

PMP

CT-ASC

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter