Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5276 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:7754
CP No. 164 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
CIVIL PETITION NO. 164 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SMT. CHANDRAMMA,
W/O LATE NYAMATI NEELAKANTAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
HOUSEHOLD,
R/O K.R PURAM MAIN ROAD,
OPPOSITE TO GALAZY LIBRARY,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.V PRAKASH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
H. MANJUNATH,
S/O DURGAPPA,
Digitally signed
by BHARATHI AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
S
RETIRED EMPLOYEE,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF R/O 'ANUGRAHA NILAYA'
KARNATAKA 1ST BLOCK, 2ND STAGE,
VINOBHANAGARA,
SHIVAMOGGA 577 201.
...RESPONDENT
THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVI RULE
1 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW HER TO PREFER THE
APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN
R.A.NO.6/2017 DATED 06/01/2022 CONFIRMING THE
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:7754
CP No. 164 of 2022
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03/11/2016 PASSED BY
COURT OF LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
SHIVAMOGGA IN O.S.NO. 112/2011 AS AN INDIGENT PERSON
BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION AND PASS SUCH OTHER
SUITABLE ORDER AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS IT
APPROPRIATE IN THE ATTENDANT FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE TO SECURE THE ENDS OF
JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a memo
which reads as follows:
"The above Civil Petition filed by the petitioner seeking for permission to prefer the regular Second Appeal in RSA No.617/2022 before this Hon'ble Court challenging the judgment and decree passed in R.A No.6/2017 dated 06.01.2022 confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S No.112/2011 as indigent person. The suit of the respondent in O.S No.112/2011 for declaration of ownership over the suit schedule property on the basis of the Sale Deed dated 28.10.2010 and for possession of the 'B' schedule property from the petitioner herein came to be decreed on 03.11.2016 and against which the appeal filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed. The respondent decree holder sued out the judgment and decree by filing Execution petition and in the said execution the petitioner delivered the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the respondent and hence, the above said regular Second Appeal has become infractuous. In view of the same, the above Civil Petition also does not survive for consideration and also become infructuous. Therefore, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above civil petition as has become infructuous in the interest of justice."
NC: 2024:KHC:7754
2. In view of the same, the above Writ Petition is
dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
SD/-
JUDGE
RMS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!