Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shahid Afridi vs Syed Farooq Ulla
2024 Latest Caselaw 5156 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5156 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Shahid Afridi vs Syed Farooq Ulla on 20 February, 2024

                                          -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:7080
                                                    MFA No. 3635 of 2016




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                        BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
                  MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3635 OF 2016 (MV-I)
             BETWEEN:

                   SHAHID AFRIDI ,
                   S/O HUMAYUN SAB @ IMAYASA,
                   AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, MINOR, STUDENT,
                   REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN
                   HIS MOTHER SHABINA BANU,
                   W/O HUMAYUN SAB @ IMAYASA,
                   RESIDING AT BARAGERAMMA TEMPLE,
                   CHITRADURGA - 577 501.
                                                                ...APPELLANT
             (BY SRI. JAGAN MOHAN M.T, ADVOCATE)

             AND:

             1.    SYED FAROOQ ULLA,
                   S/O SYED ZABINULLADIN,
                   AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
Digitally
                   OWNER OF MOTOR CYCLE,
signed by          BEARING REG.NO.KA-16/S-9902,
BHARATHI S
Location:          R/A KURUBARAHALLI VILLAGE,
HIGH COURT
OF                 CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 501.
KARNATAKA

             2.    THE BRANCH MANAGER,
                   UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
                   BRANCH OFFICE, MMK COMPLEX,
                   AKKAMAHADEVI ROAD, P.J. EXTENSION,
                   DAVANAGERE - 577 001.
                                                         ...RESPONDENTS
             (BY SRI. O. MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
                 R1 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
                   THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
             JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 8.9.2014         PASSED IN MVC
                                                 -2-
                                                              NC: 2024:KHC:7080
                                                          MFA No. 3635 of 2016




NO.200/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MACT-5, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING
THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                        JUDGMENT

The above appeal is filed by the claimants challenging the

judgment and award dated 08.09.2014 passed in

MVC.No.200/2013 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil

Judge and Additional MACT-V, Chitradurga1, seeking for

enhancement of the compensation awarded.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are

referred as per their ranking before the Tribunal.

3. The Tribunal by its judgment and award dated

08.09.2014 has awarded sum of `30,000/- together with

interest at 6% per annum. The finding of the Tribunal on

negligence and the liability is not under challenge. Hence, the

only question that is required to be considered is, 'Whether the

quantum of compensation is required to be enhanced?'

4. The age of the claimant is 12 years as on the date

of the accident. He is stated to be a student. The injuries

Hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal'

NC: 2024:KHC:7080

sustained are simple injuries. The Tribunal has awarded global

compensation of `30,000/-.

5. Upon a re-appreciation of the oral and documentary

evidence on record, it is forthcoming from the discharge card

(Ex.P.10) that the claimant was treated as an inpatient from

14.01.2013 to 22.01.2013 i.e., a period of 8 days. The CT scan

report (Ex.P.8) discloses that the claimant has sustained a head

injury. However, no fracture is noticed and only mild post

traumatic cerebral edema is noticed. The claimant was treated

conservatively as an inpatient at the District Hospital,

Chitradurga. The six photographs have produced as Ex.P.11

shows that the claimant has recovered from the injuries.

6. In view of the material available on record it is just

and proper that a global enhancement of `10,000/- be awarded

to the claimant in the present appeal.

7. In view of the aforementioned, the following:

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part;

ii) The judgment and award dated 08.09.2014 passed in MVC.No.200/2013 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT-V,

NC: 2024:KHC:7080

Chitradurga, is modified to the extent stated herein.

In all other respects, the judgment and award of the Tribunal remain unaltered;

iii) The appellant/claimant is entitled to enhancement of `10,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till its realization in addition to the compensation awarded by the Tribunal;

iv) Respondent No.2 - insurer is directed to deposit the said compensation together with accrued interest within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment;

v) After deposit, the entire enhanced compensation with accrued interest shall be disbursed to the appellant/claimant;

vi) The Registry to draw the modified award accordingly;

vii) No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

PNV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter