Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Branch Manager, M/S Cholamandalam ... vs A Nagesh S/O Anjineya
2024 Latest Caselaw 4940 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4940 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Branch Manager, M/S Cholamandalam ... vs A Nagesh S/O Anjineya on 19 February, 2024

Author: V.Srishananda

Bench: V.Srishananda

                                                   -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC-D:4006
                                                            MFA No. 22706 of 2013




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD
                                                 BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                                 BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 22706 OF 2013
                                                 (MV-I)
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   THE BRANCH MANAGER,

                           CHOLA MS GENERAL
                           INSURANCE CO.LTD., BELLARY
                           R/BY THE SENIOR MANAGER (CLAIMS)

                                                                        ...APPELLANT

                      (BY SRI. S K KAYAKAMATH, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   SRI. A NAGESH S/O ANJINEYA
                           AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: EX-PART TIME HONOURARY
SAMREEN
AYUB                       D.ED TEACHER, R/O: NAGASAMUDRA VILLAGE,
DESHNUR
Digitally signed by        TQ: MOLAKALMUR,
SAMREEN AYUB
DESHNUR
Date: 2024.02.23           DIST: CHITRADURGA, NOW RESIDING AT HALAKUNDI
14:30:09 +0530
                           VILLAGE, TQ AND DIST: BELLARY

                      2.   SRI. RAMANJINEYA S/O HONNURAPPA
                           AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER CUM
                           OWNER OF AUTO RICKSHAW BEARING
                           REGN NO.KA-26/A-4344, R/O.NAGASAMUDRA VILLAGE,
                           TQ: MOLAKALMUR, DIST: CHITRADURGA

                                                                      ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA G PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1,
                      NOTICE TO R2 SERVED)
                               -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:4006
                                        MFA No. 22706 of 2013




     THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT,
1988 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 27.02.2013
PASSED IN MVC NO.1007/2012 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, MACT-XII,
BELLARY AWADING THE COMPENSATION OF RS.2,19,305/- WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 7% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL ITS DEPOSIT.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                         JUDGMENT

Heard Sri.S.K.Kayakamath, learned counsel for the

appellant and Sri.Manjunath G Patil, learned counsel for

respondent - claimant.

2. Present appeal is filed by the Insurance

Company challenging the validity of the judgment and

award passed in MVC No.1007/2012 on the file of

Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ballari dated

27.02.2013.

3. Claimant laid a claim under Section 166 of

Motor Vehicles Act in respect of a road traffic accident

occurred on 12.01.2012 involving auto rickshaw bearing

No.KA-16/A-4344.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:4006

4. Claim petition, on contest, came to be allowed

in a sum of Rs.2,19,305/- with interest at 7% per annum

from the date of petition till realisation and fastened

liability on the Insurance Company.

5. Insurance Company being aggrieved by the said

judgment, has preferred the present appeal.

6. Sri.S.K.Kayakamath, learned counsel for the

appellant filed a memo with 'B'-register extract pertaining

to driving licence of driver of offending vehicle issued by

the RTO, Chitradurga. Copy of the same was served on the

counsel for the claimant as owner of the vehicle remained

absent before this Court.

7. Sri.S.K.Kayakamath contends that as on the

date of accident, there was no valid driving licence held by

the driver of offending auto rickshaw and thereby the

liability fastened on to the Insurance Company is incorrect.

8. Sri.Manjunath G Patil however contends that

the said contention has been taken up by the Insurance

NC: 2024:KHC-D:4006

Company for the first time and suitable opportunity be

provided to the claimant to establish the same.

9. This Court considered the rival contentions of

the parties. Matter requires to be remitted to the Tribunal

as there is serious dispute in regard to driving licence of

driver of offending vehicle.

10. Hence, the following:

ORDER

(i) Appeal is allowed.

(ii) Impugned judgment and award passed by

the Tribunal is set aside.

(iii) Matter is remitted to the Tribunal for fresh

disposal insofar as liability is concerned by

placing additional evidence on record.

(iv) Parties are at liberty to place additional

evidence on record.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:4006

(v) Parties shall appear before the Tribunal

without further notice on 18.03.2024.

(vi) Having regard to the fact that claim petition

is of the year 2012, the Tribunal shall

dispose of the same on or before

30.09.2024 after affording suitable

opportunities to the parties.

(vii) For the time being, amount in deposit is

ordered to be returned to the Insurance

Company under due identification.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter