Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Nikitha Enterprises vs M/S Shiva Ferric Pvt Ltd
2024 Latest Caselaw 4921 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4921 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

M/S Nikitha Enterprises vs M/S Shiva Ferric Pvt Ltd on 19 February, 2024

Author: H.T. Narendra Prasad

Bench: H.T. Narendra Prasad

                                      -1-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:6930
                                               RFA No. 773 of 2023




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                   DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                    BEFORE
                 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
                  REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 773 OF 2023 (MON)


            BETWEEN:

            M/S NIKITHA ENTERPRISES
            A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
            NO 162/2 SHOP NO 2
            4TH CROSS, LALBAGH ROAD
            K S GARDEN,
            BENGALURU 27
            REP BY ITS PARTNER
            SRI VIJAY SARASWAT
            S/O SOHANLAL OJA
            AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
            THE PARTNERSHIP FIRM
            HAS CLOSED IN THE YEAR OF 2017
                                                     ...APPELLANT
Digitally signed
by
HEMALATHA A (BY SRI. M S NAGARAJA.,ADVOCATE)
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka        AND:

            1.    M/S SHIVA FERRIC PVT LTD
                  HEAD OFFICE NO 193 SHIVA SADAN
                  4TH FLOOR, OPP TO NCC APARTMENT
                  OUTER RING ROAD B NARAYANAPURA
                  BENGALURU 560016
                  REP BY ITS DIRECTOR
                  SRI SHIVAKUMAR PURVA
                  AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
                         -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC:6930
                                 RFA No. 773 of 2023




     REP BY PA HOLDER
     SRI RAKESH KUMAR SINHA
     AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
     S/O LATE AWADESH KUMAR SINHA.

2.   SRI SATHYANARAYAN AGARWAL
     S/O MADAN GOPAL AGARWAL
     AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
     R/AT NO 162/1, 4TH CROSS
     LALBAGH ROAD,
     K S GARDEN
     BENGALURU-560027.
                                     ...RESPONDENTS


(BY SRI. ANNU BHARDWAJ.,ADVOCATE FOR R1:
NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH
V/O DATED: 06.11.2023)


     THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER

41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND

DECREE DATED 15.12.2022 PASSED IN OS NO.8320/2017

ON THE FILE OF THE LVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CAVIL AND

SESSIONS JDUGE, (CCH-59) BENGALURU CITY. PARTLY

DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.


     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS

DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                            -3-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:6930
                                       RFA No. 773 of 2023




                       JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is filed by appellant under Section 96

of CPC challenging the judgment and decree dated

15.12.2022 passed by the LVIII Addl. City Civil and

Sessions Judge, Bangalore in O.S.No.8320/2017,

whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of

money has been partly decreed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are

referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.

3. The plaintiff filed the suit against the defendants

for recovery of sum of Rs.10,81,000/- with interest at

24% p.a. The Trial Court after hearing the parties,

vide judgment and decree dated 15.12.2022 has party

decreed the suit and directed the defendant No.1,

Company to pay the suit claim of Rs.10,81,000/- to

the plaintiff-Company and also directed to pay interest

at 9% per annum from the date of filing the suit till

NC: 2024:KHC:6930

realization on the balance amount of Rs.5,40,717/-.

Being aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is

filed by the defendant-Company.

4. On service of notice, the respondent No.1-

plaintiff has appeared through counsel.

5. During the pendency of this appeal, both the

parties have compromised the matter. The learned

counsel appearing for the parties have filed a

compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 read

with Section 89 of the CPC. The contents of the

compromise petition is extracted hereinbelow:

MEMORANDUM OF COMPROMISE PETITION UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 3 READ WITH SECTION 89 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEFURE 1908

The appellant and respondent No.1 above named submits as follows:

1. The appellant has filed the above appeal against the Judgment and Decree passed by the

NC: 2024:KHC:6930

Learned LVIII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru city, in OS. No.8320/2017 dated:15.12.2022.

2. It is submitted that, at the intervention of the well wishers of both appellant and respondent No.1, they have arrived the amicable settlement to settle the dispute involved in the above appeal on the following terms and conditions.

3. The appellant being the Partner of appellant's Firm by name M/s Nikitha Enterprises, has agreed to pay sum of RS. 6,00,000/- (Rupees six lakhs only) to the plaintiff/the respondent No.1 as a full and final settlement towards the decree passed in OS.No.8320/2017, and the plaintiff/ respondent No.1 has agreed to receive the said amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- as a full and final settlement towards the dispute involved in the above appeal.

4. It is submitted that, in pursuance of the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court the appellant herein, has deposited sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five laksh only) before

NC: 2024:KHC:6930

the Executing Court in Ex. No.1091/2022 pending on the file of City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, the appellant, has no objection to the respondent No.1 to withdraw the said amount towards the payment of settlement amount. And further the appellant has paid the remaining amount of Rs.

1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) to the respondent No.1 by way of Demand Draft bearing No.463513 dated: 15/02/2024, drawn on Kotak Mahindra Bank, Bommanahalli Branch, before this Hon'ble Court. The respondent No.1 has acknowledged the same and the respondent No.1 has no claims against the appellant Firm in respect of the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.8320/2017.

5. It is submitted that, in view of settlement entered between the parties and also in view of the payment of the agreed amount, the respondent No.1 has no objection to allow the appeal and dispose the same in terms of the above compromise petition by modifying the decree amount as per the Judgment and Decree

NC: 2024:KHC:6930

passed by the Trial Court in O.S.No.8320/2017 dated: 15.12.2022.

6. It is submitted that, the appellant and respondent No.1 have entered this compromise petition voluntarily out of their free will and volition and there is no coercion or force from anybody else.

WHEREFORE, the appellant and respondent No.1 pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose the above appeal in terms of the compromise petition and further direct the office to refund the entire court fee paid by the appellant in the interest of justice and equity.

VERIFICATION We, the appellant and respondent No.1, above named do hereby declare and verify that, the statements made in the compromise petition at Paras 1 to 6 are true and correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief and we have put our signature to the compromise

NC: 2024:KHC:6930

petition after understanding the contents of the compromise petition on this day.

6. The parties are present before the Court and they

have been identified by their respective counsel. The

contents of the compromise petition have been read

over to the parties in the language known to them.

They have accepted the same. There is no legal or

factual inhibition to accept the compromise, as the

same is out of their volition and without any coercion

and compulsion.

7. The compromise petition signed by the parties

and their respective counsel is taken on record. This

Court after satisfying with the terms of the

compromise petition, has passed the following order:

ORDER

a) The appeal is disposed of in terms of the

compromise petition.

NC: 2024:KHC:6930

b) The compromise petition filed under Order

XXIII Rule 3 of CPC is ordered to be treated

as part and parcel of this order.

c) The Registry is directed to draw final decree

in terms of the compromise petition.

Sd/-

JUDGE

DM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter