Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. M R Rajeshwari S/O M.G.Raghavendra ... vs The Deputy Commissioner
2024 Latest Caselaw 4812 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4812 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt. M R Rajeshwari S/O M.G.Raghavendra ... vs The Deputy Commissioner on 16 February, 2024

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                              -1-
                                                    NC: 2024:KHC-D:3775
                                                         WP No. 100871 of 2024




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                          DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
                                           BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                         WRIT PETITION NO. 100871 OF 2024 (KLR-CON)
                  BETWEEN:
                  1.   SMT. M R RAJESHWARI S/O M.G.RAGHAVENDRA RAO
                       AGE. 59 YEARS,
                       OCC. AGRICULTURE,
                       R/O.OPP STATE BANK OF INDIA
                       STATION ROAD, HOSAPETE
                       TQ. HOSAPETE
                       DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                  (BY SRI. G I GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE)
                  AND:
                  1.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                       VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT
                       DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583201
                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                  (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, ADVOCATE)
                        THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
                  CONSTITUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, A. QUASH THE IMPUGNED
SUJATA  SUJATA    ENDORSEMENT ORDER DATED NIL BEARING NO.NIL PRODUCED AS
SUBHASH SUBHASH
PAMMAR PAMMAR     ANNEXURES-B AND B1 ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
                  VIJAYANAGAR BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER
                  SUITABLE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTIONS. B. DECLARE THAT THE
                  LAND BEARING SY.NO.24/1 MEASURING 0.75 ACRES AND
                  SY.NO.24/A/2 MEASURING 2 ACRES SITUATED AT NAGENAHALLI,
                  TQ.HOSAPETE, DIST.VIJAYANAGAR IS DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN
                  CONVERTED BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 95 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND
                  REVENUE ACT. C. GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON'BLE
                  COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PRESENT
                  CASE INCLUDING AN ORDER FOR COSTS MAY KINDLY BE PASSED IN
                  THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

                       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
                  COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                 -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:3775
                                         WP No. 100871 of 2024




                             ORDER

The petitioner is the owner of land bearing Sy.No.24/1 measuring 0.75 acres and Sy.No.24/A/2 measuring 2 acres situated at Nagenahalli, Tq:Hosapere, Dist:Vijayanagar, which falls within the municipal limits of Hosapete. Petitioner filed an application on 13.05.2023 under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act with respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner to permit him to divert his land for the residential purposes. However, respondent No.2 rejected the request of the petitioner for diverting the land in question for residential purposes.

2. It is not in dispute that the land in question is situated within the Municipal limits of Hosapete. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.105734 of 2016 disposed of on 21.02.2018 has held that if the land falls within the Corporation limits, the provisions of Karnataka Land Revenue Act ceases to apply to the said land. The order passed in the said writ petition was confirmed by the division bench of this Court in W.A.No.100124 of 2018. In an appeal filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by the Urban Development Authority against the judgment passed in the said writ appeal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court confirmed the order passed by this Court.

3. In view of the law laid down by this Court in the aforesaid case, there is no requirement for the petitioner to seek permission to divert the land in question for the residential purposes, and the land is deemed to have been converted.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3775

Therefore, the requirement of seeking permission to divert the land in question for the residential purposes is not necessary.

4. Accordingly the writ petition is allowed. The impugned endorsement dated 11.07.2023, issued by respondent No.2, produced at Annexure-E is hereby quashed and the petitioner is permitted to use land bearing Sy.No.24/1 measuring 0.75 acres and Sy.No.24/A/2 measuring 2 acres situated at Nagenahalli, Tq:Hosapere, Dist:Vijayanaga for residential purpose.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SSP CT:CNB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter