Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4670 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2021:KHC:45827
MFA No. 6263 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6263 OF 2018 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. A. ARASAPPA
S/O. LATE AYYASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
DECEASED BY HIS LRS.,
1(a) VIRUDAMBAL,
W/O. LATE A. ARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT NO.59/1, 7TH CROSS,
PIPELINE, MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE-560 003.
2. UMA A.,
D/O. A. ARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH 3. CHITHRA A.,
COURT OF D/O. A. ARASAPPA,
KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
4. MURTHY A.,
S/O. A. ARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
5. BHAGYALAKSHMI
D/O. A. ARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
6. MANJU A.,
D/O. A.ARASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
-2-
NC: 2021:KHC:45827
MFA No. 6263 of 2018
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
NO.59/1, 7TH CROSS,
PIPELINE, MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE-560 003.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VENKATESH P. DALWAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. C.S.SRINIVAS RAO
S/O. C. SUBBARAO,
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
2. C. S. MANJUNATH
S/O. C.S. SRINIVAS RAO,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
BANDIKODIGE HALLI VILLAGE,
B.K. HALLI POST,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. R. PUSHPAHASA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
VIDE ORDER DATED 15.12.2020
APPEAL IS DISMISSED AGAINST R1 [ABSENT])
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(C) OF CPC, AGAINST
THE ORDER DT.02.04.2018 PASSED ON MISC.NO.14/2016 ON
THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, DEVANAHALLI,
DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/O.9 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2021:KHC:45827
MFA No. 6263 of 2018
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that he
has given NOC to the appellants two years back and this Court,
having taken note of the fact that learned counsel for the
appellants is not pursuing the matter, on the previous date of
hearing on 01.02.2024, when the learned counsel for the
appellants did not appear before the Court, made it clear that,
if the learned counsel for the appellants does not appear on the
next date of hearing, the appeal will be dismissed.
2. Now, learned counsel for the appellants submits
that he has not maintained any records for having given NOC to
the appellants. When the learned counsel for the appellants
submits that he has given NOC two years back and when the
appellants are not pursuing the matter diligently by engaging
any other counsel, it appears that the appellants are not
interested in pursuing the matter.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.:32
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!