Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4655 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:6611
CRP No. 60 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 60 OF 2024 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SRI. R. MANJUNATH,
S/O M. RADHAKRISHNA SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.59/60,
GROUND FLOOR, NO.1,
SHANKARMUTT MAIN ROAD,
SHANKARAPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 004.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. B.S. SOMANATH,
Digitally S/O LATE R. SHANKARANARAYANA,
signed by H
K HEMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
Location: RESIDING AT NO. 59/60,
High Court
of Karnataka GROUND FLOOR, NO.1,
SHANKARMUTT MAIN ROAD,
SHANKARAPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 004.
...RESPONDENT
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY
THE HON'BLE 8TH ADDITIONAL, CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE (CCH15) AT BENGALURU, DATED 11.01.2024 IN
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:6611
CRP No. 60 of 2024
EXECUTION CASE NO.319/2023 ORDERS ON I.A.NO.3 AND
CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THIS PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. Aggrieved by the order passed in Ex.No.319/2023
dated 11.01.2024, passed by the VIII Additional
City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-15) At Bengaluru, the
judgment debtor therein has preferred this Civil Revision
Petition.
2. The petitioner herein suffered a decree in
O.S.No.8350/2019.
3. Ex.No.319/2023 was initiated by the decree holder to
enforce the decree and he also filed I.A.No.3 under Order
XXI Rules 43 and 54, read with Rule 64 of the CPC. The
same has been allowed by the Execution Court and it has
issued an attachment warrant of movable and immovable
properties mentioned therein. The petitioner herein is
aggrieved by the same. According to him, he is not liable
NC: 2024:KHC:6611
to pay any amounts to the decree holder. However, it is
seen from the objections filed before the Execution Court
that no such contention has been taken before the
Execution Court. Further, the decree holder admits having
suffered a decree in O.S.No.8350/2019. I do not see any
error in the order passed by the Executing Court.
4. For the aforementioned reasons, the Civil Revision
Petition is hereby dismissed.
5. However, if the petitioner has paid any amounts to
the respondents, he can always bring it to the notice of
the Executing Court and obtain the necessary orders in
accordance with law.
Pending IAs., if any stand disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CH
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!