Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4356 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:3248
CRL.P No. 100474 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100474 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
PARAMESHWAR S/O SHANKREPPA KALE,
AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O . AT/PO. SHIVALLI,
TQ. & DIST. DHARWAD.
... PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. ANAND D. BAGEWADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH DHARWAD RUAL POLICE STATION,
R/BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally
signed by
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF
MANJANNA
MANJANNA E
E Date:
2024.02.17
10:55:18
CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF COGNIZANCE
+0530
DATED 28.03.2022 ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC II DHARWAD IN C.C.NO.551/2022 FOR THE OFFENCES
P/U/SEC.126 OF REPRESENTATIVE OF PEOPLES ACT 1950,
1951, 1989, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:3248
CRL.P No. 100474 of 2024
ORDER
1. This petition is filed challenging the entire
proceedings on the ground that the order permitting
investigation by the learned Magistrate under Section
155(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ("Cr.P.C." for
short) is void, in view of the judgment rendered by this
Court in the case of Vaggeppa Gurulingappa Jangaligi
Vs. The State of Karnataka in Crl.P.No.101997/2019
disposed of on 10.12.2019.
2. In the above mentioned case, this Court has
taken the view that, the Magistrate's permission granted
on the ground that he had "perused the requisition", would
not be sufficient and certain guidelines have also been
made as to the manner in which the Magistrates are
required to consider the request for grant of permission
under 155(2) of Cr.P.C.
3. In the light of the fact that, in the instant case
also the Magistrate has merely perused and permitted to
NC: 2024:KHC-D:3248
investigate. The said order cannot be sustained in the light
of the aforementioned judgment.
4. Consequently, the proceedings are vitiated
cannot be sustained and accordingly the same is quashed.
The criminal petition is allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
EM/CT:BCK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!