Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh Singanal vs State
2024 Latest Caselaw 3573 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3573 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Suresh Singanal vs State on 6 February, 2024

Author: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

                                                    -1-
                                                            NC: 2024:KHC-D:2647
                                                              WP No. 100412 of 2021
                                                          C/W WP No. 100422 of 2021



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                           DHARWAD BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                                BEFORE

                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

                             WRIT PETITION NO. 100412 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
                                                C/W
                             WRIT PETITION NO. 100422 OF 2021 (GM-RES)


                      IN W.P. NO. 100412 OF 2021:

                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   SURESH SINGANAL,
                           AGE. 46 YEARS,
                           R/O. GANGAVATI, KOPPAL,
                           DIST. KOPPAL, KARNATAKA STATE-583227.

                      2.   MASKI SIDDANNA S/O. MALLIKARJUN,
                           AGE. 47 YEARS, R/O. GANGAVATI,
                           KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL,
                           KARNATAKA STATE-583227.

                      3.   KALLAPPA
                           AGE. 67 YEARS,
         Digitally
         signed by
         MANJANNA
                           R/O. GANGAVATI,
MANJANNA E
E        Date:
         2024.02.08
                           KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL,
         11:19:08
         +0530
                           KARNATAKA STATE-583227.
                                                                      ... PETITIONERS

                      (BY SMT. VIDYAVATHI M. KOTTURSHETTAR, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                           BY GANGAVATI RURAL POLICE,
                           DIST. KOPPAL-583227,
                           R/BY S.P.P. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                           DHARWAD.
                                -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC-D:2647
                                         WP No. 100412 of 2021
                                     C/W WP No. 100422 of 2021



2.    NANDA PALLED,
      SHERISTEDAR,
      FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES,
      TAHASILDAR OFFICE, GANGAVATI,
      DIST. KOPPAL-583227.
                                                     ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP)

       THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO IT IS HEREBY
PRAYED THAT THE COMPLAINT FILED BY COMPLAINANT I.E.,
RESPONDENT    NO.2   SMT.    NANDA    PALLED    ON   21.01.2021    BY
REGISTERING    FIR   NO.0021/2021      BEFORE    GANGAVATI        SUB
DIVISION TOWN POLICE STATION, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR
THE    OFFENSES   PUNISHABLE    U/S.3    AND    7    OF   ESSENTIAL
COMMODITIES ACT AND U./S.420 AND 201 OF I.P.C BY QUASHED BY
THIS HON'BLE COURT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.


IN W.P. NO. 100422 OF 2021:

BETWEEN:

1.    SURESH SINGANAL,
      AGE. 46 YEARS,
      R/O. GANGAVATI,
      KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL.
      KARNATAKA STATE-583227.

2.    MASKI SIDDANAN S/O. MALLIKARJUN,
      AGE. 47 YEARS, R/O. GANGAVATI,
      KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL,
      KARNATAKA STATE-583227.

3.    KALLAPPA
      AGE. 67 YEARS,
      R/O. GANGAVATI,
      KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL
      KARNATAKA STATE-583227.
                                                      ... PETITIONERS

(BY SMT. VIDYAVATHI M. KOTTURSHETTAR, ADVOCATE)
                               -3-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:2647
                                        WP No. 100412 of 2021
                                    C/W WP No. 100422 of 2021




AND:

1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA,
     BY GANGAVATI RURAL POLICE,
     DIST. KOPPAL-583227,
     R/BY STATE S.P.P.
     HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.

2.   K.R. DEVARAJ
     FOOD SHERISTEDAR, TALUK OFFICE,
     GANAGAVATI, DIST. KOPPAL-583227.
                                                   ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP)

       THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO IT IS HEREBY

PRAYED    THAT   THE   COMPLAINT    FILED   BY   COMPLAINANT   I.E.

RESPONDENT NO.2 K.R. DEVARAJ ON 21.01.2021 BY REGISTERING

FIR NO.0052/2021 BEFORE GANGAVATI SUB DIVISION RURAL

POLICE STATION, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES

PUNISHABLE U/S.3 AND 7 OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT AND

U/S.420 AND 201 OF I.P.C., BE QUASHED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT,

IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. B) ISSUE AN ORDER OR DIRECTION

IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.



       THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                  -4-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC-D:2647
                                           WP No. 100412 of 2021
                                       C/W WP No. 100422 of 2021



                              ORDER

1. These petitions are filed challenging the

registration of criminal proceedings for the offences

punishable under Sections 3 and 7 of Essential

Commodities Act and under Sections 420 and 201 of I.P.C.

2. The allegation in the complaint is that the

petitioners were transporting rice, which was meant for

distribution under the Public Distribution System.

3. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in

Criminal Petition No.101739/2021 and connected matters,

disposed of on 16.2.2022, has held that unless the goods

in question were examined by the Forensic Science

Laboratory and certified to be an essential commodity

meant for Public Distribution System, the proceedings

would be unsustainable.

4. In these cases, admittedly, there is no

certification by the Forensic Science Laboratory that the

rice that was seized was meant for Public Distribution. In

that view of the matter, in the light of the above

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2647

judgment, these petitions are allowed and the proceedings

stands quashed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

VB CT:BCK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter