Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lokesh W/O Peeraji Wanti vs District Health And Family Welfare ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 3511 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3511 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Lokesh W/O Peeraji Wanti vs District Health And Family Welfare ... on 6 February, 2024

Author: V.Srishananda

Bench: V.Srishananda

                                               -1-
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:2527
                                                       MFA No. 102549 of 2014




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                             BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.102549 OF 2014 (MV-I)
                     BETWEEN:

                     LOKESH W/O. PEERAJI WANTI,
                     AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC:SERVICE,
                     R/O. CCB QUARTERS NO.13,
                     AZAM NAGAR, BELAGAVI.

                                                                  ...APPELLANT

                     (BY SMT. SHRUTI A. NEELOPANT, ADVOCATE)

                     AND:

                     1.   DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER,
                          R/O. BELAGAVI.

                     2.   THE DIRECTOR,
                          KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT
        Digitally
        signed by
        SAMREEN           INSURANCE DEPARTMENT (KGID),
SAMREEN AYUB
AYUB    DESHNUR
DESHNUR Date:
        2024.02.15
                          SADASHIV NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
        13:29:57
        +0530                                                  ...RESPONDENTS

                     (BY SRI. PRAVEEN Y. DEVAREDDIYAVAR, HCGP)

                          THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV
                     ACT, AGAINST JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.12.2013,
                     PASSED IN MVC NO.2319/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE IV
                     ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI,
                     PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION
                     AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

                          THIS M.F.A., COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
                     THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                  -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:2527
                                          MFA No. 102549 of 2014




                            JUDGMENT

Though the matter is listed for admission, by consent of

parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

2. Heard Miss. Shruti A. Neelopant, learned counsel for

the appellant and Shri. Praveen Y. Devareddiyavar, learned

High Court Government Pleader.

3. Claimant is in appeal on the ground of inadequacy

of the compensation awarded in MVC No.2319/2011 dated

11.12.2013 on the file of VI Additional District and Sessions

Judge, Belagavi.

4. Facts which are not in dispute are as under:

4.1. Claimant being injured in a road traffic accident

involving government vehicle bearing registration No.KA-22/G-

390, laid a claim before the Tribunal for awarding suitable

compensation.

5. Claim petition on contest came to be allowed in a

sum of Rs.75,000/- with interest at the rate of 7% per annum

from the date of petition till realization.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2527

6. Being not satisfied with the award of compensation,

the claimant is in appeal.

7. Miss. Shruti A. Neelopant, learned counsel for the

appellant reiterating the grounds urged in the appeal

memorandum sought for suitable enhancement by contending

that no amount is awarded on the head of loss of future income

on account of disability.

8. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader,

supports the impugned judgment.

9. In view of the rival contentions of the parties, this

Court perused the material on record meticulously.

10. Admittedly, the disability sustained by the claimant

is assessed by the doctor vide Ex.P.7 is 20%.

11. Admittedly, P.W.-2 is not a treated doctor.

12. Under such circumstances, it is regular practice of

the Court that 1/3rd of the disability factor shown in the

disability certificate is to be assessed by the Court while

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2527

computing the compensation on the head of loss of future

income on account of disability.

13. In the case on hand, no amount is awarded on the

head of loss of future income on account of disability. If the

monthly income is taken at Rs.5,500/- in the absence of proper

proof of income of the claimant, the disability factor would be

7% and proper multiplier would be 16.

14. Therefore, on the said head itself, the claimant is

entitled to compensation in a sum of Rs.73,920/-.

15. Taking into note that the award of compensation on

the other heads is on the lower side, this court is of the

considered opinion that if a sum of Rs.75,000/- is enhanced

globally, ends of justice would be met.

16. Accordingly, the following order is passed:

ORDER

(i) Appeal is allowed in part.

(ii) As against a sum of Rs.75,000/-

awarded by the Tribunal, the claimant would

be entitled to a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- as

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2527

global compensation with interest at the rate

of 7% per annum from the date of petition till

its realization.

(iii) Respondent is granted four weeks

time to deposit the quantum of

compensation.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SMM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter