Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3284 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:4728
RSA No. 693 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANIL B KATTI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 693 OF 2009 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SMT AISABI
W/O SABU BEARY,
GATTIMANE HOUSE,
KEDAMBADY VILLAGE,
POST KEDAMBADY, PUTTUR TALUK,
D.K.DISTRICT-574 251
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.B.K.S.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.N.SHANKARA NARAYANA BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 IBRAHIM BEARY
S/O HASSAN KUNHI MUKHRI,
SINCE DECEASED
Digitally signed
by SUMITHRA R BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 1A AISAMMA
KARNATAKA
D/O LATE IBRAHIM BEARY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
RESIDENT OF IDAPADY
KEDAMBADY POST
KEDAMBADY VILLAGE
PUTTUR TALUK
D.K. DISTRICT-574 210
1B AISAMMA
W/O.LATE IBRAHIM BEARY
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
RESIDENT OF KEDAMBADY VILLAGE
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:4728
RSA No. 693 of 2009
KEDAMBADY POST-574 210
1C ASHRAF
S/O.LATE IBRAHIM BEARY
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/O.KEDAMBADY VILLAGE
KEDAMBADY POST
PUTTUR TALUK
D.K. DISTRICT-574 210
1D UMMER
S/O.LATE IBRAHIM BEARY
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
RESIDENT OF GATTAMANE HOUSE
KEDAMBADY VILLAGE
KEDAMBADY POST
PUTTUR TALUK
D.K. DISTRICT-574 210
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 22.1.2009 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.105/1994 THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN)
PUTTUR, D.K., DISMISSED THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 7.10,1994 PASSED IN
O.S.NO. 22/1986 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. MUNSIFF COURT,
PUTTUR, D.K.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:4728
RSA No. 693 of 2009
JUDGMENT
Sri B K S Prakash, counsel representing Sri N
Shankara Narayana Bhat, learned counsel for the appellant
present.
Sri G Balakrishna Shastry, learned counsel for
caveator respondent No.1 (A to D), present.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
seeking withdrawal of appeal.
3. Heard both sides on memo for withdrawal filed by
counsel for the appellant.
4. In view of the memo, the appellant is permitted to
withdraw the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
rs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!