Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Jagadish S/O Girimallappa Baragi vs Government Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 3184 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3184 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Dr. Jagadish S/O Girimallappa Baragi vs Government Of Karnataka on 2 February, 2024

Author: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

                                               -1-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:2382
                                                      WP No. 112955 of 2014




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                       DHARWAD BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                             BEFORE

                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

                           WRIT PETITION NO. 112955 OF 2014 (S-RES)

                      BETWEEN:

                      DR. JAGADISH S/O GIRIMALLAPPA BARAGI,
                      AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE,
                      ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,
                      JSS COLLEGE, VIDYAGIRI,
                      DHARWAD.
                                                            ... PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. ANOOP G. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
                           R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
         Digitally
         signed by
         MANJANNA
                           HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
MANJANNA E
E        Date:
         2024.02.06
         11:26:13
                           M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
         +0530

                           BENGALURU-560001.

                      2.   ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR,
                           DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,
                           PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU.

                      3.  REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR,
                          DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,
                          MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, DHARWAD.
                                                          ... RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI. BHOJEGOUDA T. KOLLER, AGA)
                                -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:2382
                                       WP No. 112955 of 2014




     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
CALL FOR RECORDS RELATING TO THE CASE FROM THE
RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES PERTAINING TO THE CASE OF
PETITIONER AND ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY
OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER BY QUASHING
ENDORESMENT ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DATED
22.04.2014 BEARING NO. PÁ²E / 205 / jPÀ / PÀAµÀ / zsÁ«/
2013-14 / £Éë-2 AS PER ANNEXURE-H AND ORDER
DATED 21.02.2014, PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN
APPEAL NO.28/2013 (ED 238 UPC 2013) AS PER
ANNEXURE-J AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:

                             ORDER

1. The petitioner has challenged the order by which

his request for regularization in V.M.S.R.V. Arts, Science &

Commerce College, Hunagund has been rejected.

2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Karnataka State Private College Stop Gap Lecturers

Association, B.R. Parineeth Vs. State of Karnataka1

had passed an order on 29.01.1992, issuing the following

directions:

LAWS(SC)-1992-1-30

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2382

(1) Services of such temporary teachers who have

worked as such for three years, including the

break till today shall not be terminated. They

shall be absorbed as and when regular

vacancies arise.

(2) If regular selections have been made the

Government shall create additional posts to

accommodate such selected candidates.

(3) The teachers who have undergone the process

of selection under the directions of the High

Court and have been appointed because of the

reservation policy of the Government be

regularly appointed by creating additional

posts.

(4) From the date of judgment every temporary

teacher shall be paid salary as is admissible to

teachers appointed against permanent post.

(5) Such teachers shall be continued in service

even during vacations.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2382

3. The petitioner had not completed three years of

Service in V.M.S.R.V. Arts, Science & Commerce College,

Hunagund and was therefore not entitled for the benefit of

the said order.

4. However, the petitioner's case was considered in

the category of those stop gap lecturers, who had

completed three years after 29.01.1992 and though the

services of the petitioner was dispensed with from

V.M.S.R.V. Arts, Science & Commerce College, Hunagund,

his services were regularized on 11.08.1998 in Mahantha

Swamy Arts, Science & Commerce College, Hamsabhavi on

the ground that there was a need in the said College and

the Management had also no objection for his

regularization.

5. After the petitioner was regularized in the year

1998, he has raised a dispute in 2011 requesting that his

services be regularized with effect from the date on which

he had completed his three years service as a stop gap

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2382

Lecturers in V.M.S.R.V. Arts, Science & Commerce College,

Hunagund.

6. The petitioner sought to bring his case within the

third category specified in the order of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court i.e., teachers who had undergone the process of

selection under the direction of the High Court and had not

been appointed because of the reservation policy of the

Government.

7. Since the petitioner took advantage of the

regularization of his services made in Mahantha Swamy

Arts, Science & Commerce College, Hamsabhavi in 1998, in

my view, it would not be open for him to reagitate his claim

for regularization from the completion of three years

service from the date he was initially appointed in

V.M.S.R.V. Arts, Science & Commerce College, Hunagund

and thereby bring himself within the first category of the

cases indicated in the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2382

8. In my view, since the petitioner has already

been regularized by bringing his case into the second

category of the lecturers indicated in the order of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court, it would not be permissible for him

to revive his claim for regularization under the first

category. The petition is therefore dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

VNP*/CT:BCK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter