Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Income Tax Officer Tds vs M/S Pooja Footwear Private Limtied
2024 Latest Caselaw 19893 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19893 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Income Tax Officer Tds vs M/S Pooja Footwear Private Limtied on 7 August, 2024

Author: Mohammad Nawaz

Bench: Mohammad Nawaz

                                            -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC:31946
                                                    CRL.A No. 1339 of 2021




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                        DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

                                          BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
                           CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1339 OF 2021
                BETWEEN:

                      THE INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS
                      INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT WARD-2(3),
                      HMT BAVAN BELLARY ROAD,
                      BANGALORE-560 032
                                                               ...APPELLANT
                (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                1.    M/S POOJA FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED
                      NO.19/1, SHANKARA DEVARA MUTT LANE,
                      MANAVARATHPET,
                      BANGALORE-560 003
Digitally             (A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT,
signed by             REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR RA LALWANI)
YAMUNA K L
Location:       2.    RAJ LALWANI DIRECTOR,
High Court of         M/S. POOJA FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED
Karnataka             NO.19/1, SHANKARA DEVARA MUTT LANE,
                      MANARAVARPET,
                      BANGALORE-560 003
                                                            ...RESPONDENTS



                       THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.377(1)   OF CR.P.C PRAYING
                TO SET ASIDE THE SENTENCE IMPOSING FINE ON THE
                               -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:31946
                                     CRL.A No. 1339 of 2021




RESPONDENT NO.1 AND ENHANCE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED
ON THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN C.C.NO.80/2019 BY THE
SPL.COURT FOR ECONOMIC OFFENCES AT BENGALURU DATED
19.03.2020

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ


                     ORAL JUDGMENT

I.A.No.1/2023 is filed for recalling the order dated

15.03.2023 passed by this Court, dismissing the appeal for

non-prosecution for not complying the office objections in

spite of granting sufficient time.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits this

appeal preferred under Section 377 of Code of Criminal

Procedure seeking enhancement of sentence imposed by

Trial Court lies to the Sessions Court, in view of the order

passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.2104/2023 and

connected matters disposed on 12.07.2024. Paragraph 25

of the order passed in the said case reads as follows :-

NC: 2024:KHC:31946

"25. On a reading of Section 418 of BNSS it is in pari materia with Section 377 of Cr.P.C.

Even under the BNSS no provision has been introduced for filing appeal before the High Court if the sentence is passed by the Magistrate. Sub-Section (3) of Section 415 of BNSS provides for filing appeal to the Court of Sessions against judgment of conviction on a trial held by the Magistrate. The reasons noted supra will also apply to the appeals filed or to be filed under Section 418 of BNSS"

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he

may be permitted to approach the Sessions Court against

the impugned order.

4. In the light of the above submission made and in

view of the order passed by this Court in the above

referred appeals and also accepting the reasons stated in

the memorandum of facts accompanying the application,

the order dated 15.03.2023 passed by this Court is hereby

recalled. I.A.No.1/2023 is allowed.

NC: 2024:KHC:31946

5. The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. It is

open for the appellant to seek remedy as available under

law.

6. If any appeal is preferred by the appellant before the

Sessions Court, the time consumed in prosecuting this

appeal shall be taken into consideration by the

jurisdictional Court, while computing the delay.

Sd/-

(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE

NG

CT:SNN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter