Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Srigiddappa Narayanappa vs State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 19714 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19714 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Srigiddappa Narayanappa vs State Of Karnataka on 6 August, 2024

                                          -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC:31213
                                                     MFA No. 4808 of 2024




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                        DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

                                        BEFORE
                     THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
                 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4808 OF 2024 (KPIDFA)
                BETWEEN:

                      SRI. GIDDAPPA NARAYANAPPA
                      S/O LATE GIDDAPPA,
                      AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
                      PRESIDENT OF SEVEN HILLS,
                      GOLDEN STORE BUILDING,
                      3RD CROSS ROAD, RAO AND RAO
                      MANGALORE CITY,
                      KARNATAKA
                                                              ...APPELLANT
                (BY SRI. MADHAVA MURTHY B V., ADVOCATE)
                AND:

                1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      MANGALORE NORTH POLICE STATION,
                      MANGALORE CITY,
                      DAKSHINA KANNADA,
Digitally             REPRESENTED BY
signed by             LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
YAMUNA K L
Location:       2.    ECONOMIC OFFENCES DEPARTMENT
High Court of         PALACE ROD,
Karnataka
                      C.I.D., BENGALURU.
                      REPRESENTED BY
                      LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
                                                           ...RESPONDENTS

                     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.16 OF THE KARNATAKA
                PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL
                ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED.
                07.11.2023 PASSED IN CRL. MISC.NO.381/2023 ON THE FILE
                OF   THE   PRL.  DISTRICT   AND      SESSIONS  JUDGE,
                                 -2-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC:31213
                                            MFA No. 4808 of 2024




D.K.MANGALURU, REJECTING THE PETITION FILED UNDER
SECTION 438 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:    HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

                      ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal is filed aggrieved by the order passed

by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, D.K.,

Mangaluru in Crl.Misc.No.381/2023 dated 07.11.2023.

2. The office has raised an objection with regard to

maintainability of the appeal against the order passed by

the Principal District & Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangaluru in

Crl.Misc.No.381/2023 dated 07.11.2023 since the petition

is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying for grant of

anticipatory bail in view of Section 16 of KPIDFA Act, this

appeal is not maintainable.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied on the

circular dated 12.10.2022, wherein, it is stated that in

view of Section 16 of the Karnataka Protection of Interest

of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004, the

appeal under Section 16 of the Karnataka Protection of

NC: 2024:KHC:31213

Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act,

2004, shall be given sub classification as "MFA (KPIDFA)"

and the same shall be posted as per MFA's

(miscellaneous) Roaster and basing on that, the counsel

submits that the appeal is maintainable before this Court.

This court is not able to appreciate the said submission

and the said circular do not apply to the proceedings

arising out of an application filed under Section 438 of

Cr.P.C., appeal to the high Court in respect of criminal

proceeding cannot be a Miscellaneous First Appeal.

Hence, the appellant is permitted to withdraw this appeal

and file an appropriate petition.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Registry is directed to return all the documents,

forthwith.

6. All IA's in this writ petition shall stand closed.

Sd/-

(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

KA CT: SNN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter