Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19301 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:30441
RFA No. 501 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.501 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1. MANJUNATHA,
S/O MURUDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R/O ANJANAIAH STREET, NAVULE,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI H.MALATESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. PADMAVATHI @ PADMAMMA.
DEAD BY LRS.
1(a) BHAGYA,
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M W/O RAMESH,
Location: HIGH D/O PADMAVATHI @ PADMAMMA
COURT OF AND MALLIKARJUNAPPA,
KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O 1ST CROSS,
HOSAMANE EXTENSION,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201.
1(b) KUSUMA,
W/O NAGESH,
D/O PADMAVATHI @ PADMAMMA
AND MALLIKARJUNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O NEW MANDI,
BESIDE PETROL BUNK,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:30441
RFA No. 501 of 2024
GANDHARVA NAGARA,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201.
2. SHARADAMMA,
W/O PANDURANGA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/O III CROSS, TANK MOHALLA,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201.
3. LAKKAMMA,
W/O SHIVANNA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/O DODDAKAPPALU,
SALIGRAMA, MUNDUR TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT-577 201.
4. PREMA,
W/O LATE RAJASHKHAR,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/O 4TH CROSS, BAPUJI NAGARA,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201.
5. ANNAPPA, DEAD BY LRS.
5(a) SHIVU,
S/O LATE ANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
R/O NAVULE VILLAGE.
SY. NO.109/1,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201.
6. SARASWATHI,
W/O BABU,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/O GURUPURA VILLAGE,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201.
7. KAMALAMMA,
W/O MUTTU,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O PENSION MOHALLA, II CROSS
SHIVAMOGGA CITY-5477201
...RESPONDENTS
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:30441
RFA No. 501 of 2024
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.07.2023 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.4/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA, ALLOWING THE
PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 278 OF INDIAN SUCCESSION
ACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Memo filed. Memo reads as under:
"The undersigned advocate for appellant submits that, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw above appeal with a liberty to convert above RFA into MFA, in the interest of justice."
2. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Further, the time spent in
this appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computation of
limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
MD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!