Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raghu @ Thimma vs State Of Karnataka By Sho
2024 Latest Caselaw 19188 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19188 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Raghu @ Thimma vs State Of Karnataka By Sho on 1 August, 2024

Author: S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S Vishwajith Shetty

                                              -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:30528
                                                      CRL.P No. 5561 of 2024




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

                                          BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                           CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5561 OF 2024
                   BETWEEN:

                   RAGHU @ THIMMA,
                   S/O LATE KEMPARANGAIAHA,
                   AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                   R/O 268, 7TH CROSS,
                   RUKUMININAGAR,
                   NAGASANDRA POST,
                   BENGALURU - 560 073.
                                                               ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. K.V. SATEESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHO,
                   UPPARPET POLICE STATION,
Digitally signed   BENGALURU - 560 001,
by YAMUNA K L
Location: High     REPRESENTED BY
Court of           STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Karnataka
                   KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING,
                   BANGALORE - 560 001.
                                                              ...RESPONDENT
                   (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)

                        THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
                   ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE CR.NO.142/2012
                   REGISTERED IN UPPARPET POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY
                   DISTRICT, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 3, 25, 26 AND 27(2) OF
                   THE ARMS ACT AND SEC. 120B OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE
                                -2-
                                              NC: 2024:KHC:30528
                                          CRL.P No. 5561 of 2024




OF LX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-61) AT
BENGALURU CITY.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                       ORAL ORDER

Accused No.1 is before this Court under Section 439

of Cr.P.C with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in

Sc.No.1052/2023 pending before the Court of LX

Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, arising

out of Crime No.142/2012 registered by Upparpet Police

Station, Bangalore City for the offences punishable under

Section 120-B of IPC r/w Sections 3, 25, 26 and 27(2) of

Arms Act.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner was earlier granted bail in this matter and

thereafter, since he had not appeared before the Trial

Court, a split-up case was directed to be registered against

him. Accused Nos.6 and 7, against whom similar charges

NC: 2024:KHC:30528

are found, were tried in S.C.No.1474/2012 and the said

accused have been acquitted by the Trial court for the

charge sheeted offences by judgment and order dated

30.10.2023. Petitioner has surrendered himself in the spit

up case on 13.04.2023 and was remanded to judicial

custody. There is absolutely no progress in the split-up

case till date and even the charge is not framed against

the petitioner. Accordingly, he prays to allow this petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP has opposed this

petition. He submits that the petitioner was absconding for

nearly 10 years and if he is enlarged on bail, he is likely to

again flee away from justice and the trial, in the split-up

case would be further delayed. Accordingly, he prays to

dismiss this petition.

5. The material on record would go to show that

the petitioner was in custody in the present case for the

period from 09.06.2012 to 17.04.2013. Subsequently, he

was enlarged on bail by this Court in Crl.P.No.1937/2013.

Thereafter, since the petitioner did not appear before the

NC: 2024:KHC:30528

Trial Court, the case against him was split-up and accused

Nos.6 and 7 as against whom similar charges are found in

the chargesheet, were tried for the charge sheeted

offences and by the judgment and order dated 30.10.2023

passed in S.C.NO.1474/2012, were acquitted by the Trial

Court and the said judgment and order of acquittal has

attained finality.

6. Petitioner has surrendered in the split-up case

in S.C.No.1052/2023 on 13.04.2023 and ever since then

he is in custody. Order sheet in S.C.No.1052/2023 would

go to show that till date, the Trial Court has not even

framed charges against the petitioner in the split-up case.

The apprehension of learned HCGP can be taken care of by

imposing appropriate conditions. Accordingly, the

following:

ORDER

The petition is allowed.

NC: 2024:KHC:30528

The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in

Sc.No.1052/2023 pending before the Court of LX

Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, arising

out of Crime No.142/2012 registered by Upparpet Police

Station, Bangalore City for the offences punishable under

Section 120-B of IPC r/w Sections 3, 25, 26, 27(2) of

Arms Act, subject to the following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

b) The petitioner shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons;

c) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

d) The petitioner shall not involve in similar offences in future;

NC: 2024:KHC:30528

e) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without permission of the said Court until the case registered against him is disposed off.

f) In the event of petitioner violating any of the aforesaid bail conditions, the State is at liberty to seek cancellation of bail.

Sd/-

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

KVR

CT: BHK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter