Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravindra Shetty S/O Jagannath Shetty vs Ramayya S/O Chandayya Yargol
2024 Latest Caselaw 9838 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9838 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Ravindra Shetty S/O Jagannath Shetty vs Ramayya S/O Chandayya Yargol on 4 April, 2024

                                              -1-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC-K:2841
                                                        RSA No. 7384 of 2010




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                                      KALABURAGI BENCH


                            DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                            BEFORE

                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

                   REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.7384 OF 2010 (DEC/POS)

                   BETWEEN:
                          RAVINDRA SHETTY S/O JAGANNATH SHETTY
                          SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S.

                   1(a) POORNIMA W/O RAVINDRANATH SHETTY
                        AGE: 57EARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD
                        R/O. R.G.MALU ENCLAVE, INDUSTRIAL ARE
                        EWARGI CROSS KALABURAGI.

                   1(b) DR. PRATIKSHA D/O RAVINDRANATH
                        SHETTY W/O NIKHAL SHETTY
                        AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR
                        R/O: DOOR NO.303 B BLOCK
                        STAFF QUARTERS K.S. HEGDE MEDICAL COLLEGE,
Digitally signed
by RAMESH               DERALAKATTE MANGALURU
MATHAPATI               KARNATAKA-575018.
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka          1(c)   PRAJWAL S/O RAVINDRANATH SHETTY
                          AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                          R/O R.G.MALU ENCLAVE, INDUSTRIAL ARE
                          JEWARGI CROSS KALABURAGI.

                                                                 ...APPELLANTS
                   (BY SRI. SHIVANAND PATIL, DVOCATE)
                            -2-
                                 NC: 2024:KHC-K:2841
                                    RSA No. 7384 of 2010




AND:
       RAMAYYA S/O CHANDAYYA YARGOL
       SINCE DECEASED

1(a) SAVITRIBAI W/O LATE RAMAYYA YARGOL
     AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: TRADING BUSINEESS,
     R/O. MOHAN BAR, STATION ROAD HOUSE,
     SITUATED AT SAME LANE KALABURAGI.

1(b) YASHODA W/O RAGHAVENDRA
     AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD
     R/O. MOHAN BAR, STATION ROAD HOUSE
     SITUATED AT SAME LANE KALABURAGI.

1(c)   MEEEKAKSHI W/O AMADAYYA
       AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
       R/O. MOHAN BAR, STATION ROAD HOUSE
       SITUATED AT SAME LANE KALABURAGI.

1(d) MAHESHANKUMAR S/O LATE RAMAYYA
     AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD
     R/O. MOHAN BAR, STATION ROAD HOUSE
     SITUATED AT SAME LANE KALABURAGI.

                                          ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VENKATESH C. MALLABADI, ADV. FOR R1(a) TO (d))


     THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO
ALLOWED BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 14.08.2007 PASSED IN O.S. NO.141/2006 BY LEARNED
I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE(SR.DN.) GULBARGA AND JUDGMENT OF
THE APPELLATE COURT R.A.NO.81/2007 JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 31.05.2010 BY LEARNED IV ADDL. DIST.
JUDGE    AT     GULBARGA    CONFIRMING    THE    SAME,
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SUIT IN ALTERNATIVE REMIT
THE MATTER TO THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT TO DECIDE
AFRESH AND ETC.
     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR SETTLEMENT , THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                         -3-
                                                NC: 2024:KHC-K:2841
                                                      RSA No. 7384 of 2010




                                 JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo in

which it is stated as under:

"MEMO

The parties to the appeal, on the intervention of elders and well-wishers have amicably settled the dispute and in terms of such compromise/agreement, it was agreed by the respondents, represented by respondent No.1(d), that they shall sell and it was also agreed by the appellants represented by the appellant No.1 to purchae the suit sproperty for Rs.4,00,000/-. In terms thereof, the respondenet No.1(d) on receipt of the entire consideration amount, has executed a registered sale deed vie doct.No.25136/2023-24 dated 21.03.2024/27.03.2024 in favour of the appellant No.1 and affirmed the possession of the suit property by the appellants. Copy of the sale deed is annexed to this Memo. In view thereof, the appeal would not survive for consdieration and may be disposed as settled out of Court.

Hence this Memo."

2. Appellant No.1-Smt. Poornima W/o Ravindranath

Shetty has put her signature to the memo. Appellant No.3

Prajwal S/o Ravindranath Shetty affixed his signature with an

NC: 2024:KHC-K:2841

endorsement "No objection to close the appeal". Copy of the

sale deed dated 21st March, 2024 is also produced along with

sketch and transaction receipt dated March 26, 2024. The

same are placed on record.

3. In view of the memo, appeal is disposed of as settled

out of Court. Registry to send back the Trial Court records to

the concerned Court.

Sd/-

JUDGE

LNN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter