Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Chandramma vs Dadapeer K
2024 Latest Caselaw 9731 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9731 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Chandramma vs Dadapeer K on 4 April, 2024

Author: Jyoti Mulimani

Bench: Jyoti Mulimani

                                                 -1-
                                                              NC: 2024:KHC:13964
                                                           MFA No. 4215 of 2014




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                              BEFORE
                              THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4215 OF 2014(MV-I)
                      BETWEEN:

                      SMT. CHANDRAMMA
                      W/O BASAVARAJAPPA,
                      AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
                      AGRICULTURAL COOLIE,
                      R/O HOSA-KOLENAHALLI,
                      DAVANAGERE.
                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SMT. ANANYA RAI., ADVOCATE
                          SRI. VISHWAJITH RAI.M., ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    DADAPEER.K
                            S/O KHASIM SAB,
                            AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
                            OWNER AND DRIVER OF MOTOR CYCLE
Digitally signed by         BEARING NO.KA-27/J-1935,
THEJASKUMAR N               R/O HOSA-KOLENAHALLI,
Location: HIGH              DAVANAGERE TALUK-577 001.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                      2.    THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
                            BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
                            MELAGIRI PLAZA,
                            DENTAL COLLEGE ROAD,
                            M.C.C., 'B' BLOCK,
                            DAVANAGERE-577 001.

                      3.    CHANNABASAPPA.S.SHIDENUR
                            S/O SHAMASUNDRAPPA SHIDENUR,
                            KOLAPUR POST,
                                      -2-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:13964
                                                MFA No. 4215 of 2014




    BYADAGI TALUK,
    HAVERI DISTRICT-581 110.
                                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(R1 AND R3-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
  BY SRI. JANARDHAN REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:31.08.2013
PASSED IN MVC NO.791/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT-IV, DAVANAGERE.

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION,      THIS        DAY,    THE      COURT      DELIVERED       THE
FOLLOWING:
                               JUDGMENT

Smt.Ananya Rai., learned counsel on behalf of

Sri.Vishwajith Rai.M., for the appellant and Sri.Janardhan

Reddy., learned counsel for respondent No.2 have appeared

in person.

2. Notice to the respondents was ordered on

12.09.2014. A perusal of the office note depicts that

respondents 1 & 3 are served and unrepresented. They have

neither engaged the services of an advocate nor conducted

the case as party in person.

NC: 2024:KHC:13964

3. The claimant has preferred the captioned appeal

seeking enhancement of the compensation.

4. Learned counsel for the respective parties have

urged several contentions. Heard, the contentions urged on

behalf of the respective parties and perused the appeal

papers and also the records with utmost care.

5. The point that would arise for consideration is

whether the Claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation.

6. The Claimant's appeal is one for enhancement of

compensation and modification of the judgment. The

grounds urged in the present appeal are mainly relating to

the meager compensation awarded under different heads by

the Tribunal. The Claimant has suffered pain and agony

owing to the injuries sustained in the accident in question.

Hence, this Court deems it appropriate to award Rs.20,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) towards pain and sufferings

as against Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) awarded

by the Tribunal.

NC: 2024:KHC:13964

The compensation of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Thousand only) towards Medical expenses remains intact.

This Court deems it appropriate to award Rs.22,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Two Thousand only) towards Loss of

amenities and loss of full enjoyment of life as against

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only).

It is noticed that the Tribunal has not awarded

compensation towards loss of income during laid up period.

There is no proof of income, hence the chart prepared by the

Legal Service Authority must be taken into consideration. As

per the chart, if the accident is occurred in the year 2011,

the salary of the injured must be taken as Rs.6,500/-

(Rupees Six Thousand Five Hundred only) per month. Hence,

the amount towards loss of income during laid up period is

calculated as under:

Rs.6,500/- X 2 months = Rs.13,000/-

7. Accordingly, this Court re-determines the

compensation as under:-

NC: 2024:KHC:13964

1. Pain and Sufferings 5,000 + 15,000 Rs.20,000/-

2. Medical Expenses 10,000 Rs.10,000/-

3. Loss of amenities and 10,000 + 12,000 Rs.22,000/- full enjoyment of life

4. Loss of income during 6,500 X 2 Rs.13,000/-

laid up period

Total: Rs.65,000/-

(Less) Compensation awarded by the -Rs.25,000/-

Tribunal:

Enhanced compensation awarded by Rs.40,000/-

this Court:

8. Hence, the following:

ORDER

1. The Miscellaneous First appeal is

allowed and the Judgment dated:31.08.2013

passed by the Court of Prl. Senior Civil Judge &

MACT-IV, Davanagere in M.V.C No.791/2011 is

modified to the extent stated hereinabove.

2. The claimant is entitled for the

enhanced compensation of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees

Forty Thousand only) with 6% interest per

NC: 2024:KHC:13964

annum from the date of the claim petition till the

date of realization.

3. The second respondent Insurance

Company shall deposit the enhanced

compensation amount along with 6% interest

within a period of two months from the date of

receipt of the certified copy of this Judgment.

4. The Registry to draw the modified

award accordingly.

5. Office is directed to transmit the

original records to the concerned Tribunal

forthwith.

Sd/-

JUDGE TKN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter