Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. Naveen Kumar G. R vs The Manager
2024 Latest Caselaw 9640 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9640 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Mr. Naveen Kumar G. R vs The Manager on 3 April, 2024

Author: Jyoti Mulimani

Bench: Jyoti Mulimani

                                                 -1-
                                                              NC: 2024:KHC:13615
                                                            MFA No. 7892 of 2014




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                               BEFORE
                              THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7892 OF 2014 (MV)
                      BETWEEN:

                      MR. NAVEEN KUMAR.G.R.
                      @ NAVEEN
                      S/O RANGARAJU,
                      AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
                      R/AT GODHIHALLI VILLAGE,
                      BUKKAPATNA POST,
                      C.N.DURGA HOBLI,
                      KORATAGERE TALUK,
                      TUMKUR DISTRICT-562 009.
                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SMT. SREE VIDHYA., AND
                          SRI. T.N.VISWANATHA., ADVOCATES)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE MANAGER,
Digitally signed by         M/S. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE
THEJASKUMAR N               COMPANY LIMITED,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                    NO.9/2, MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS,
KARNATAKA                   M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.

                      2.    SHRI. ABDUL RASHEED,
                            S/O SALEHA SHARIFF,
                            MAJOR,
                            R/AT KUMBAR STREET,
                            KORATEGERE TOWN,
                            TUMKUR DISTRICT-562 091.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI. C.R.RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
                        R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
                                     -2-
                                                    NC: 2024:KHC:13615
                                               MFA No. 7892 of 2014




      THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:24.10.2013
PASSED IN MVC NO.2209/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XII
ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT,
BANGALORE.

      THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION,       THIS    DAY,       THE    COURT     DELIVERED         THE
FOLLOWING:
                               JUDGMENT

Smt.Shreevidhya., learned counsel on behalf of

Sri.T.N.Viswanatha., for the appellant and Sri.C.R.Ravishankar.,

learned counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person.

Emergent notice to the respondents was ordered on

31.01.2015. A perusal of the office note depicts that

respondent No.2 is served and unrepresented. He has neither

engaged the services of an advocate nor conducted the case as

a party in person.

2. Though the appeal is listed today for admission, it is

heard finally.

3. The claimant has preferred the captioned appeal

seeking enhancement of the compensation.

NC: 2024:KHC:13615

4. Learned counsel for the respective parties have

urged several contentions. Heard, the contentions urged on

behalf of the respective parties and perused the appeal papers

and the records with utmost care.

5. The point that requires consideration is whether the

claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation.

6. The claimant's appeal is one for enhancement of

compensation and modification of the Judgment. The grounds

urged in the present appeal are mainly relating to the meager

compensation awarded under different heads.

It is not in dispute that the claimant was a minor aged 16

years as on the date of accident. The disability of the claimant

was assessed at 24% to the whole body. The Hon'ble Apex

Court in MASTER MALLIKARJUN VS. DIVISIONAL

MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

AND ANOTHER reported in 2014 (14) SCC 396, has held

that if the disability is upto 30%, then compensation of

Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh only) must be awarded.

Therefore, compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh

only) is awarded.

NC: 2024:KHC:13615

The compensation of Rs.24,920/- (Rupees Twenty Four

Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty only) towards Medical

expenses remains intact.

7. Accordingly, this Court re-determines the

compensation as under:-

1. Loss of future income Due to disability; Loss Of amenities in life, Happiness and frustration;

Conveyance, 3,00,000 Rs.3,00,000/-

   Attendant charges, food
   and nourishment; Pain
   and sufferings; Loss of
   marriage         prospectus;
   Loss        of     academic
   carrier.
2. Medical Expenses                       24,920          Rs.24,920/-
                                               Total     Rs.3,24,920/-
       Less: Compensation awarded by the                -Rs.2,04,720/-
                                            Tribunal
                        Enhanced compensation            Rs.1,20,200/-




          8.    Hence, the following:

                                          NC: 2024:KHC:13615





                             ORDER
      1.    The    Miscellaneous      First       appeal     is

allowed     and   the      Judgment   dated:24.10.2013

passed     by   the     MACT,     Bangalore       in    M.V.C

No.2209/2011 is modified to the extent stated

hereinabove.

2. The claimant is entitled for the enhanced

compensation of Rs.1,20,200/- (Rupees One Lakh

Twenty Thousand Two Hundred only) with interest

at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the

claim petition till the date of realization.

3. The first respondent - Insurance

Company is directed to deposit the enhanced

compensation amount along with 6% interest

within a period of two months from the date of

receipt of the certified copy of this Judgment.

4. Needless to observe that the claimant is

not entitled for the interest for delayed period.

5. The Registry to draw the modified award

accordingly.

NC: 2024:KHC:13615

6. The office is directed to transmit the

records to the Tribunal forthwith.

Sd/-

JUDGE MRP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter