Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Manjunatha H vs State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 10753 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10753 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri Manjunatha H vs State Of Karnataka on 19 April, 2024

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                              -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:15434
                                                       WP No. 10194 of 2024




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                            BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                         WRIT PETITION NO. 10194 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
                   BETWEEN:

                         SRI. MANJUNATHA H,
                         S/O HANUMANTHRAYAPPA,
                         AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                         R/AT: NO.5, DASANAPURA HOBLI,
                         BETHANAGERE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
                         BENGALURU - 562 123.
                                                             ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SMT. SHRIDEVI BHOSALE, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                         DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
                         VIDHANA SOUDHA,
Digitally signed         BENGALURU - 560 001,
by NAGAVENI
Location: HIGH           REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   2.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                         CUM SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,
                         KEMPEGOWDA ROAD,
                         BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA,
                         BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 009.

                   3.    THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                         BENGALURU DISTRICT,
                         BENGALURU - 562 123.
                                 -2-
                                              NC: 2024:KHC:15434
                                           WP No. 10194 of 2024




4.   THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
     NELMANGALA TOWN POLICE STATION,
     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
     BENGALURU - 562 123.

5.   THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
     MADANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE STATION,
     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
     BENGALURU - 562 123.
                                                  ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA)

     THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO i) QUASH THE
NOTICE DATED 23/03/2024, IN PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO.
M.A.G(4)/GADIPARU/CR/321/2023-24, ISSUED BY THE R2,
THEREBY CALLING UPON HIM TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY AN
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN UNDER SECTION 55 OF
KARNATAKA POLICE ACT, FOR EXTERNMENT OF THIS
PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                              ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following

prayers:

"i. Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Notice dated 23.03.2024, in proceedings bearing No.M.A.G.(4)/Gadiparu/C.R.No.321/2023-24, issued by the Respondent No.2, thereby calling upon him to show cause as to why an action should not be taken under Section 55 of the Karnataka Police Act, for externment of this Petitioner, vide ANNEXURE-'A' and;

ii. Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Proceedings in case bearing No.M.A.G.(4)/Gadiparu/C.R.No.321/2023-24, pending on the file of the Deputy Commissioner, Cum Sub

NC: 2024:KHC:15434

Divisional Magistrate, Bengaluru District, vide ANNEXURE-'A', and;

iii. Grant all consequential orders, and;

iv. Pass such other order or orders as the case may be, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Heard Smt. Shridevi Bhosale, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K.P. Yoganna, learned AGA

appearing for the respondents and have perused the material

on record.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that the issue in the lis stands answered by the

judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.No.392/2023 disposed

on 21.03.2024 in as much as the report that needs to be

appended to the notice is not appended to the notice seeking to

show cause as to why the petitioner should be not externed.

Therefore, there is violation not only of the act law laid down by

the Apex Court in the case of DEEPAK V. STATE OF

MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS1 as also the order passed by

this Court in W.P.No.392/2023.

2022 SCC OnLine SC 99

NC: 2024:KHC:15434

4. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

ORDER

i. Writ Petition is allowed.

ii. The show cause notice dated 23.03.2024 which

does not append the report stands quashed.

iii. The matter is remitted back to the hands of the

competent authority to issue a show cause

notice appending to the report and take

necessary action in accordance with law.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SJK

CT: BHK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter