Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10753 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:15434
WP No. 10194 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 10194 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MANJUNATHA H,
S/O HANUMANTHRAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT: NO.5, DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BETHANAGERE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
BENGALURU - 562 123.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SHRIDEVI BHOSALE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
Digitally signed BENGALURU - 560 001,
by NAGAVENI
Location: HIGH REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CUM SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,
KEMPEGOWDA ROAD,
BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 009.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
BENGALURU DISTRICT,
BENGALURU - 562 123.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:15434
WP No. 10194 of 2024
4. THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
NELMANGALA TOWN POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
BENGALURU - 562 123.
5. THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
MADANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
BENGALURU - 562 123.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO i) QUASH THE
NOTICE DATED 23/03/2024, IN PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO.
M.A.G(4)/GADIPARU/CR/321/2023-24, ISSUED BY THE R2,
THEREBY CALLING UPON HIM TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY AN
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN UNDER SECTION 55 OF
KARNATAKA POLICE ACT, FOR EXTERNMENT OF THIS
PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following
prayers:
"i. Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Notice dated 23.03.2024, in proceedings bearing No.M.A.G.(4)/Gadiparu/C.R.No.321/2023-24, issued by the Respondent No.2, thereby calling upon him to show cause as to why an action should not be taken under Section 55 of the Karnataka Police Act, for externment of this Petitioner, vide ANNEXURE-'A' and;
ii. Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Proceedings in case bearing No.M.A.G.(4)/Gadiparu/C.R.No.321/2023-24, pending on the file of the Deputy Commissioner, Cum Sub
NC: 2024:KHC:15434
Divisional Magistrate, Bengaluru District, vide ANNEXURE-'A', and;
iii. Grant all consequential orders, and;
iv. Pass such other order or orders as the case may be, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Heard Smt. Shridevi Bhosale, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K.P. Yoganna, learned AGA
appearing for the respondents and have perused the material
on record.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the issue in the lis stands answered by the
judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.No.392/2023 disposed
on 21.03.2024 in as much as the report that needs to be
appended to the notice is not appended to the notice seeking to
show cause as to why the petitioner should be not externed.
Therefore, there is violation not only of the act law laid down by
the Apex Court in the case of DEEPAK V. STATE OF
MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS1 as also the order passed by
this Court in W.P.No.392/2023.
2022 SCC OnLine SC 99
NC: 2024:KHC:15434
4. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
i. Writ Petition is allowed.
ii. The show cause notice dated 23.03.2024 which
does not append the report stands quashed.
iii. The matter is remitted back to the hands of the
competent authority to issue a show cause
notice appending to the report and take
necessary action in accordance with law.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SJK
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!