Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Andanagouda S/O Sangangouda Goudar vs The Additional Special Land ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 10571 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10571 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Andanagouda S/O Sangangouda Goudar vs The Additional Special Land ... on 18 April, 2024

                                           -1-
                                                  NC: 2024:KHC-D:6517
                                                    WP No. 101174 of 2024




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                        DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                        BEFORE

                          THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA

                       WRIT PETITION NO.101174/2024(LA-RES)

                BETWEEN:
                ANDANAGOUDA
                S/O. SANGANGOUDA GOUDAR,
                AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                R/O: SHIRUR,
                TQ. AND DIST: BAGALKOTE - 587 120.
                                                             ...PETITIONER

                (BY SRI VIJAYENDRA BHIMAKKANAVAR, ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                1.   THE ADDITIONAL SPECIAL
                     LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
                     UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT NO. 1,
                     NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOTE,
Digitally
                     DIST: BAGALKOTE - 587 120.
signed by
MANJANNA E
Location:       2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
High Court of
Karnataka            NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOTE,
                     DIST: BAGALKOTE - 587 120.

                3.   SHEKHARAGOUDA
                     S/O. SANGANGOUDA GOUDAR,
                     AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                     R/O: REVADIHAL VILLAGE,
                     TQ: HUNAGUND,
                     DIST: BAGALKOTE - 587 125.

                4.   MALLANGOUDA
                     S/O. SANGANGOUDA GOUDAR,
                               -2-
                                    NC: 2024:KHC-D:6517
                                     WP No. 101174 of 2024




    AGE: 68 YEARS,
    OCC: AGRICULTURE,
    R/O: REVADIHAL VILLAGE,
    TQ: HUNAGUND
    DIST: BAGALKOTE - 587 125.
                                               ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR RESP. NO.1 AND 2)
(NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4 IS SERVED)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/DIRECTION TO
THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND TO
CONSIDER    THE    PASS    APPROPRIATE     ORDERS    ON    THE
APPLICATION    VIDE   ANNEXURE-J    AND    THEREBY   FURTHER
KINDLY DIRECT THE EXECUTING COURT FOR PAYMENT OF
COMPENSATION OF RS.32,52,406/- ALONG WITH INTEREST
DEPOSITED     IN   FDR    NO.5/2023-24    OF   CANARA     BANK,
HUNGUND, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. ISSUE
APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS, DIRECTING THE OFFICE OF THE
COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND TO
RELEASE RS.32,52,406/- ALONG WITH THE INTEREST KEPT IN
FIXED DEPOSIT BEARING FDR NO.5/2023-24 OF CANARA
BANK, HUNGUND, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY
AND ETC.,


     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
- B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                   -3-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC-D:6517
                                            WP No. 101174 of 2024




                              ORDER

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of

writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Senior Civil

Judge and JMFC, Hungund (for short, 'the Trial Court') to

consider and pass appropriate orders on the application

produced as per Annexure-J in Execution Case No.16/2021

for the purpose of releasing the amount that was deposited

by respondent No.1.

2. Heard Sri Vijayendra Bhimakkanavar learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Kirtilata R. Patil

learned HCGP appearing for respondents No.1 and 2.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner is the Decree Holder No.1, who was claimant

before the Trial Court along with respondents No.3 and 4.

There was a compromise between claimants in the suit

O.S.No.35/2023 and they agreed to apportion the

compensation in terms of the compromise. The suit

O.S.No.35/2023 was accordingly decreed. Execution Case

No.16/2021 was filed by the Decree Holders against

respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 being the Judgment

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6517

Debtor deposited the compensation amount before the Trial

Court in terms of the compromise decree. The petitioner is

entitled for the said amount. Therefore, he filed the

application as per Annexure-J, seeking payment of the

deposited amount. The said application is not being

considered by the Executing Court on the ground that

respondent No.4 being the Decree Holder No.3 is not

appearing before the Court. Since respondent No.4 has

already received his part of compensation, he is not

appearing before the Executing Court. Under such

circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court

seeking a direction. Accordingly, he prays for allowing the

petition.

4. Learned HCGP appearing for respondents No.1 and 2

submitted that the dispute is inter se between the Decree

Holders, who are the claimants. Respondent No.1 has

nothing to do with the same as the compensation amount of

Rs.32,52,406/- is already deposited and it is for the Court to

pass orders. Hence, she prays for passing appropriate

orders.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6517

5. Perused the material on record.

6. As per the contention taken by the petitioner, the

suit O.S.No.35/2023 was filed for partition and separate

possession. The same was decreed in terms of the

compromise petition. The very same property said to have

been acquired and respondent No.1 has deposited the

compensation amount. According to the petitioner, he is

entitled for the said amount and filed an application as per

Annexure-J. Annexure-J is dated 27.06.2023. It is also

stated that till date no order is passed on the said

application. I do not find any reason to keep the application

pending as it is stated that respondent No.3 has submitted

no objection for allowing the application and for paying the

amount to the petitioner. The Executing Court is required to

consider the compromise decree and determine the

entitlement of the petitioner for the compensation amount.

The Court cannot indefinitely wait for respondent No.4 who is

Decree Holder No.3, to appear before the Court and submit

his no objection. Therefore, I am of the opinion that petition

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6517

is liable to be allowed. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the

following :

ORDER

(i) Petition is allowed.


     (ii)    The Executing Court is directed to consider

             the    application   Annexure-J       filed   by    the

             petitioner    for    payment     of     amount       of

             Rs.32,52,406/-         in      Execution           Case

No.16/2021 in accordance with law within a

period of 30 days from the date of receipt of

certified copy of this order.

SD/-

JUDGE

CKK/CT-ASC

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter