Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10147 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:14630
MFA No. 1449 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1449 OF 2019 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
RUKMANGADHA
S/O.CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.118/2,
T.ANNAIAPPA MAIN ROAD,
THIGALARPET, BANGALORE.
...APPELLANT
(SRI. RUKAMANGADHA - APPELLANT (ABSENT))
AND:
1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA @ LAKSHMI
D/O. N. CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.76/B, 8TH CROSS,
8TH MAIN, PRAKASHNAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 021
Digitally 2. SMT. LALITHAMMA
signed by BS D/O CHIKKANNA,
RAVIKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
Location: RESIDING AT NO.327, 8TH CROSS,
HIGH
COURT OF KASTURBA COLONY, VEERANNA GUDDE,
KARNATAKA GIRINAGAR II STAGE, BSK III PHASE,
BANGALORE.
3. BHAGYAMMA
D/O CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
NO.122, 4TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
HOSAGUDDADAHALLI,
SHAMANNA GARDEN,
BANGALORE.
4. CHANDRAMMA
D/O N. CHIKKANNA,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:14630
MFA No. 1449 of 2019
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
NO.111, 5TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS,
CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE.
5. BALARAJU
S/O. N CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
NO.118/2, T.ANNAIAPPA MAIN ROAD,
THIGALARPET, BANGALORE.
6. PURUSHOTHAMA
S/O. N. CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.118/2,
T.ANNAIAPPA MAIN ROAD,
THIGALARPET, BANGALORE.
7. NAGARATHNA
D/O N. CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.118/2,
T.ANNAIAPPA MAIN ROAD,
THIGALARPET, BANGALORE
8. CHIKKANNA
S/O. LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.118/2,
T.ANNAIAPPA MAIN ROAD,
THIGALARPET, BANGALORE
9. SRI. JNANAMURTHY
S/O. CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.6, 8TH A CROSS,
MAGADI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
10. SRI. PADMANABHA
S/O CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.118/2,
T.ANNAIAPPA MAIN ROAD,
THIGALARPET, BANGALORE.
...RESPONDENTS
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:14630
MFA No. 1449 of 2019
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(d) OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.12.2018, PASSED
IN MISC.NO.450/2011, ON THE FILE OF THE XXXV ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-36), DISMISSING THE
PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation for the appellant. On
28.03.2024, the learned counsel for the appellant was
permitted to retire from the case of the appellant and the
notice of retirement was issued to the appellant.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HJ
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!