Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6852 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:35233-DB
WA No.1144 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
WRIT APPEAL NO.1144 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. C. DILIP KUMAR
S/O LATE MUKUNDRAJ CHAINRAJ
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT OLD NO.626, NEW NO.40/2
PID NO.22-78-40/2, 62ND CROSS
Digitally signed 5TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560010.
by RUPA V ...APPELLANT
Location: HIGH
COURT OF (BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. ADV., FOR
KARNATAKA SRI. SHARANJITH SHETTY K, ADV.,)
AND:
1. MR. K.P. DEVAIAH
S/O K.G. POOVAIAH, AGED MAJOR
NO.34, 2ND FLOOR, 2ND CROSS
VARNASI ROAD, SUNNY LAYOUT
T.C.PALYA, BANGALORE-560036.
2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
CITY UNION BANK LTD
MALLESHWARAM BRANCH
NO.58/1, 13TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD
MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560003
REPRESENTED BY CHIEF MANAGER/
AUTHORIZED OFFICER
T.S. AMIRTHA GANESH
S/O M.T. SHANMUGAM SUNDARAM
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:35233-DB
WA No.1144 of 2023
3. M/S KEERTHI ENTERPRISES
NO.23, 3RD CROSS
NANJAPPA GARDEN
BAHUSA PALYA
BANGALORE-560016
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
MR. K.P. DEVAIAH.
4. MRS. K.D. RAMYA
W/O K.G. DEVAIAH
AGED MAJOR, NO.34
2ND FLOOR, 2ND CROSS
VARNASI ROAD, SUNNY LAYOUT
T.C.PALYA, BANGALORE-560036.
5. M/S SAMSKRUTHI ENTERPRISES
SHOP NO.23 , 3RD CROSS
NANJAPPA GARDEN, BABUSAPALYA
BANGALORE-560016
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
MRS. K.D. RAMYA.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF
WRIT PETITION No.6462/2021. ALLOW THE PRESENT APPEAL
AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HONBLE COURT IN WRIT
PETITION No.6462/2021 & ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
G.NARENDAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard learned Senior counsel Sri.Shashikiran Shetty
along with the learned counsel for the appellant.
NC: 2023:KHC:35233-DB WA No.1144 of 2023
2. In paragraph No.1 of the order dated
17.08.2023 passed in W.P.No.6462/2021 it is seen that the
learned Single Judge has recorded an agreement of parties
to participate in the auction, thereafter in an unnumbered
paragraph Nos.2 and 3, there are certain directions which
the appellant claims he is not consented to. In that view of
the matter, we are of the opinion that it would be in the
interest of parties that they move before the learned Single
Judge for clarification or review as may be advised.
3. With the above observation, writ appeal is
disposed of, liberty is reserved to the appellant to seek
clarification or review of the order impugned.
4. The proposition of the parties is protected for a
period of two weeks from today.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE BSR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!