Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6796 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2023
-1-
CRL.RP No. 740 of 2015
NC: 2023:KHC:34750
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 740 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
SMT. SATHYABHAMA,
W/O NAGARAJA B.M,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
C/O LAKSHMANAPPA,
VIDDINAKOPPA, M.R.S. ROAD,
JYOTHINAGAR, SHIMOGA - 572 015.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. ARCHANA K. M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. SAROJAMMA,
W/O ERANNA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
D. NO. 46, VARADARAJ NILAYA,
Digitally BEHIND CHANDRALAYA,
signed by
RENUKAMBA JANNAPURA, BHADRAVATHI - 572 015.
KG ...RESPONDENT
Location: (BY SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R. PATEL, ADVOCATE)
High Court of
Karnataka THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND
SENTENCE DATED 30.08.2012 PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL
JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL JMFC BHADRAVATHI IN
C.C.NO.4012/2010 IN CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR AN
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF THE
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT AND THE JUDGMENT PASSED
IN CRL.APPEAL 187/2012 DATED 16.04.2015 ON THE FILE OF
-2-
CRL.RP No. 740 of 2015
NC: 2023:KHC:34750
IV ADDITIONAL DISTRCIT & SESSIONS JUDGE SHIVMOGA
SITTING AT BHADRAVTHI.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel Smt. Archana .K.M has filed memo
of appearance for the revision petitioner and she has
produced the certified copy of the order sheet in
C.C.No.4012/2010, wherein, it is evident that the revision
petitioner/accused was arrested and was remanded to
judicial custody on 03.09.2023.
2. Further, order sheet dated 22.09.2023 discloses
that the revision petitioner has paid the entire fine amount
of Rs.77,000/- imposed by the trial Court. The conviction
by the trial Court is for the offence punishable under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and fine
imposed was itself for Rs.77,000/-. The said order being
challenged in the appeal which came to be dismissed and
now the matter is being assailed by way this revision. But
when the revision petitioner, has paid the entire fine
amount, it was the duty of the learned Magistrate to
CRL.RP No. 740 of 2015 NC: 2023:KHC:34750
release the revision petitioner but the learned Magistrate
extended the remand on the ground that there is an order
passed by this Court to remand her until further orders by
this Court.
3. However, when the fine imposed by the trial
Court is completely paid, the learned Magistrate has no
power to remand the revision petitioner any further and it
amounts to illegal detention.
4. Smt. Archana .K.M has filed a memo stating
that since the entire fine amount is deposited by the
petitioner, he is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
5. The aforesaid memo is placed on record.
6. In view of the memo, the revision petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
7. Since, the entire fine amount is already paid by
the revision petitioner the learned Magistrate is directed to
issue release intimation of the revision petitioner
immediately.
CRL.RP No. 740 of 2015 NC: 2023:KHC:34750
Release intimation shall be issued by hand as prayed
for.
Sd/-
JUDGE
URN
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!